Mike Blezien wrote:
Hello All,
We've been revamping alot of our older perl scripts and a question came
up that I wasn't a 100% clear on. When calling sub routines, is there a
significate difference in these formats:
1) some_subroutine();
2) &some_subroutine;
This syntax has the special property
Mike Blezien [MB], on Monday, September 06, 2004 at 15:40 (-0500) has
on mind:
MB> 1) some_subroutine();
use this one.
MB> is one a more prefered or more effecient to use then the other(s)??
I think is a more prefered, about eficienty it is same. &sub() is good
only when it has the same name as
Hello All,
We've been revamping alot of our older perl scripts and a question came up that
I wasn't a 100% clear on. When calling sub routines, is there a significate
difference in these formats:
1) some_subroutine();
2) &some_subroutine;
3) &some_subroutine();
is one a more prefered or more eff