May I connect remotely to an IVB machine ? - ideally the one on which you've
tested they fail.
You could send the credentials via IM or mail.
Could you please test on other platforms like HSW, SKL or BSW to see if the
tests fail there too ?
-Original Message-
From: Weng, Chuanbo
Sent:
The previous implementation works on IVB.
SLM on IVB is active.
All the utest_run you list below fail.
It fails like below(seems the result is not calculated correctly):
compiler_workgroup_reduce_add_float()[FAILED]
Error: ((float *)buf_data[1])[i] == cpu_res
at file
/root/opencl/beignet
The code doesn't use anything particular to the BDW platform - nor does it use
anything different aside from the previous implementation. Does the previous
implementation (prior to the patch) work on IVB ?
I haven't tested it on IVB or HSW, just BDW. Another issue might be about the
SLM in IVB -
the move instruction should have same type src & dst.
Signed-off-by: Ruiling Song
---
backend/src/llvm/llvm_gen_backend.cpp | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/backend/src/llvm/llvm_gen_backend.cpp
b/backend/src/llvm/llvm_gen_backend.cpp
index 6646536..32f8fe3
the flag register is used by the condition source, we have
to store the dst register in GRF. when using this dst, will
update from the allocated GRF to flag register.
Signed-off-by: Ruiling Song
---
backend/src/backend/gen_reg_allocation.cpp | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git
to do an image barrier, we need to:
1. flush L3 RW cache.
2. do a barrier gateway.
3. flush sampler cache.
Note the fence argument maybe ORed together.
We need to support non-immediate barrier() argument.
Signed-off-by: Ruiling Song
---
backend/src/backend/gen8_encoder.cpp | 24 ++
Which platform does your code base on?
I've run ./utest_run compiler_workgroup_reduce_add_float on IVB and BDW, it
succeed on BDW but fail
on IVB.
-Original Message-
From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
Grigore Lupescu
Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2016 5:2
