subject:"\[Beignet\] \[PATCH\] Utest\: test pow, not powr, on negative x"

Re: [Beignet] [PATCH] Utest: test pow, not powr, on negative x

2016-09-28 Thread Yang, Rong R

LGTM, pushed, thanks. > -Original Message- > From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of > Rebecca N. Palmer > Sent: Monday, September 26, 2016 7:21 > To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH] Utest: test pow, not p

[Beignet] [PATCH] Utest: test pow, not powr, on negative x

2016-09-25 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer

powr(x,y) is explicitly undefined for negative x; on my hardware, it happens to be correct in default mode, but acts like pow(abs(x),y) in fast (OCL_STRICT_CONFORMANCE=0) mode, failing the test. Signed-off-by: Rebecca Palmer diff --git a/utests/utest_math_gen.py