On 2014.10.27 17:53:51 +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
On 2014.10.27 12:57:59 +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
On 2014.10.24 18:10:36 +0800, Zhigang Gong wrote:
This assertion is just to make sure we will not get a NULL pointer
for a normal buffer. The OpenCL spec doesn't give a very specific
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 02:19:54PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
On 2014.10.27 17:53:51 +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
On 2014.10.27 12:57:59 +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
On 2014.10.24 18:10:36 +0800, Zhigang Gong wrote:
This assertion is just to make sure we will not get a NULL pointer
for a
On 2014.10.27 12:57:59 +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
On 2014.10.24 18:10:36 +0800, Zhigang Gong wrote:
This assertion is just to make sure we will not get a NULL pointer
for a normal buffer. The OpenCL spec doesn't give a very specific
statement about a NULL buffer object. But it does allow to
On 2014.10.24 18:10:36 +0800, Zhigang Gong wrote:
This assertion is just to make sure we will not get a NULL pointer
for a normal buffer. The OpenCL spec doesn't give a very specific
statement about a NULL buffer object. But it does allow to pass
a NULL to a buffer object. Thus some one may
This assertion is just to make sure we will not get a NULL pointer
for a normal buffer. The OpenCL spec doesn't give a very specific
statement about a NULL buffer object. But it does allow to pass
a NULL to a buffer object. Thus some one may implement the following
kernel:
__kernel foo( global
