; From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Rebecca N. Palmer
> Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 2:46 PM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Beignet] Status of cl_khr_gl_sharing
>
> The *missing* functions aren't likely to be a probl
The *missing* functions aren't likely to be a problem: as far as I can
tell,
http://sources.debian.net/src/forge/0.9.2-2/examples/opencl/cl_helpers.h/?hl=72#L72
is the only place in Debian that tries to use one of them, and it
correctly handles its absence.
I'm more worried about the
e2D.
> -Original Message-
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Simon Richter
> Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 12:28 AM
> To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Beignet] Status of cl_khr_gl_sharing
>
> Hi,
>
&g
Hi,
On 01.08.2017 23:39, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> As beignet's Debian maintainer, I am considering whether to enable CL-GL
> sharing in our package, given its incomplete state.
I haven't looked at it since the initial package, because back then it
required the Mesa source code in order to get
As beignet's Debian maintainer, I am considering whether to enable CL-GL
sharing in our package, given its incomplete state.
Fedora do enable it, and have a Blender crash bug
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101779 , though as I can't
reproduce this I can't tell whether disabling
