powr(x,y) is explicitly undefined for negative x; on my hardware,
it happens to be correct in default mode, but acts like pow(abs(x),y)
in fast (OCL_STRICT_CONFORMANCE=0) mode, failing the test.
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Palmer
diff --git a/utests/utest_math_gen.py
A patch set for supporting LLVM 3.9 was posted here last month
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/beignet/2016-August/007843.html
, but not pushed; why?
Debian mesa plans to switch to 3.9
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=836913
and we would normally follow.
This patch is still under review, and it will soon be pushed as it is reviewed.
Thanks
Xiuli
-Original Message-
From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
Rebecca N. Palmer
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2016 6:38 AM
To: beignet@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject:
How did you work out a non-X ubuntu? Installed an ubuntu server edition?
/dev/dri is supported by linux kernel, try this command to see whether there is
drm and i915 module:
lsmod | grep i915
Maybe you can update your linux kernel to latest version and try again.
Thanks,
Chuanbo Weng