On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 12:50 +0200, Beat Rubischon wrote:
Hello!
Am 18.7.2007 17:35 Uhr schrieb Patrick Ohly unter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
For clusters it's time to replace it with a solution that works better
in a LAN.
[2] http://ptpd.sourceforge.net/
It looks like an interesting tool
Jim Lux wrote:
That's it.. a Vista PC is a TV/DVD player that can also run office
applications.
(I do find humorous all the references to viewing medical imagery
simultaneously with watching protected HD-DVD content. Yeah, that's
what *I* want the radiologist on call doing.. watching a
Hi Kevin,
I believe that your company is using this list for pure marketing wars
for a long time, so don't be surprise when someone responds back.
If you want to put technical or performance data, and than to make
conclusions out of it, be sure to compare apples to apples. It is easy
use the
Hi Gilad,
Thank you for the personal attack that came, apparently without even
reading the email I sent. Brian asked about why the publicly available,
independently run MPI2007 results from HP were worse on a particular
than the Cambridge cluster MPI2007 results. I talked about three
Hi Patrick,
Patrick Ohly wrote:
That's all for now (and probably enough stuff, too ... although perhaps
you prefer detailed emails over bullet items on a PowerPoint
presentation). So what do you think?
Since you are asking, here is my personal opinion: I don't think there
is a need for a
Gilad Shainer wrote:
Hi Kevin,
I believe that your company is using this list for pure marketing wars
for a long time, so don't be surprise when someone responds back.
Quite a lot of companies post to this list.
People from Microsoft, Intel, AMD, Qlocig/Pathscale, Myricom,
Scalable
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 04:07:09PM -0400, Patrick Geoffray wrote:
NTP's precision is good enough
for comparing log and other administration needs.
I agree with this, however, there's another upcoming use of very high
resolution synchronized clocks: synchronizing timer ticks across your
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 10:43:10AM -0700, Gilad Shainer wrote:
You had previously compared Mellanox based products on dual single-core
machines to the InfiniPath adapter on dual dual-core machines and
claim that with InfiniPath there are more Gflops This latest release
follow the same
Greg Lindahl wrote:
time on all your nodes, which should improve performance when you have
big clusters and a lot of synchronization in your code.
Provided it scales well and it's integrated in the kernel. I guess You
could also think about revisiting the gang scheduling ideas with a
better
At 01:07 PM 7/20/2007, Patrick Geoffray wrote:
Hi Patrick,
Patrick Ohly wrote:
That's all for now (and probably enough stuff, too ... although perhaps
you prefer detailed emails over bullet items on a PowerPoint
presentation). So what do you think?
Since you are asking, here is my personal
Dear Kevin,
You continue to set world records in providing misleading information.
You had previously compared Mellanox based products on dual single-core
machines to the InfiniPath adapter on dual dual-core machines and
claim that with InfiniPath there are more Gflops This latest release
Gilad,
And you would never compare your products against our deprecated
drivers and five year old hardware. ;-)
Sorry, couldn't resist. My colleagues are rolling their eyes...
Scot
On Jul 20, 2007, at 2:55 PM, Gilad Shainer wrote:
Hi Kevin,
I believe that your company is using this list
12 matches
Mail list logo
