Hallo Bogdan,
Freitag, 18. April 2008, meintest Du:
BC Sorry to divert a bit the thread towards its initial subject and away
BC from the security issues currently discussed...
BC I've just seen a presentation from a University (which shall remain
BC unnamed) which partnered with Microsoft
In message from Kilian CAVALOTTI [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fri, 18 Apr
2008 16:38:26 -0700):
...
The same benchmark on lower-end hardware (E5345) running Linux (same
4X
DDR IB though), gives roughly 30% better results:
#---
# Benchmarking PingPong
#
Microsoft's MPI stack has never used DAPL.
V1 (Windows Compute Cluster Server 2003) uses WinsockDirect. High-speed
interconnects like Infiniband plug into this stack through the existing
WinsockDirect provider interface.
V2 (Windows HPC Server 2008, coming soon) introduces a new provider
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008, Jan Heichler wrote:
BC But then I changed my mind when I started
BC to hear what a great feature it is to have several nodes booting and
BC installing the OS in the same 50 minutes (yes, minutes!) that a single
BC node takes, due to a wonderful feature called multicast.
