They are _definitively_ worth waiting for,
although I am not familiar with the release
timing. But I have been running on a dual-socket
with 8 cores and 16 SMTs. And I say they are worth waiting for.
Håkon
At 01:57 14.10.2008, Ivan Oleynik wrote:
I am still in process of purchasing a new
Andrea Di Blas wrote:
or - are there any commercial products based on MPI that one could buy
and run in their own company/institution? for example, let's say I want
do do some simulations of whatever kind, and I like matlab. can I go buy
a cluster of some kind, and also buy some matlab
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 02:19:41PM -0400, Prentice Bisbal wrote:
And you can always lie to the support - CentOS, for all practical and
technical purposes, *IS* RHEL.
But this requires cleverness -- often install scripts and the like
look at /etc/redhat-release or the redhat-release rpm.
--
Marian Marinov wrote:
http://linuxpmi.org is alive again.
There was a network problem which is now fixed and the site is running again.
Hello, Marian.
I've been checking it periodically, and I noticed it was back up, but
thanks for letting me know. Last time I looked, there had not been any
Thanks, Håkon.
Did you really hold the Nehalem Xeon chips in your hands? They probably
require new motherboards with a new chipset.
It would be nice to hear from you some numbers concerning Harpertown vs
Nehalem performance.
Unfortunately, I can not wait beyond Jan 1 due to financial
Rahul Nabar wrote:
Thanks John. I will do that. A question: how likely is it that this is
a software issue and not hardware from my symptoms? They keep harping
on the fact that I am running a non-validated OS. We used to run
Fedora. Now run CentOS. Same issues. They only support RedHat. I
Did you really hold the Nehalem Xeon chips in your hands? They probably
require new motherboards with a new chipset.
absolutely
It would be nice to hear from you some numbers concerning Harpertown vs
Nehalem performance
those who know will not be able tell you because of the NDA.
i think
Greg Lindahl wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 02:19:41PM -0400, Prentice Bisbal wrote:
And you can always lie to the support - CentOS, for all practical and
technical purposes, *IS* RHEL.
But this requires cleverness -- often install scripts and the like
look at /etc/redhat-release or the
... and, the statement below is based on
comparing Harpertown to Nehalem. I have not
tested products from Intel's competitors and compared them to Nehalem.
Thanks, Håkon (speaking for himself)
At 07:50 14.10.2008, Håkon Bugge wrote:
They are _definitively_ worth waiting for,
although I am
On 14 Oct 2008, at 22:00, Igor Kozin wrote:
Did you really hold the Nehalem Xeon chips in your hands? They
probably require new motherboards with a new chipset.
absolutely
It would be nice to hear from you some numbers concerning Harpertown
vs Nehalem performance
those who know will
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:00:16PM +0100, Igor Kozin wrote:
then make your choice between Barcelona and Harpertown.
if you are lucky you can get Shanghai which is expected by the end of the
year.
Those of us who ordered Shanghai's when first announced should be
getting them fairly soon. I'm
In message from Håkon Bugge [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tue, 14 Oct 2008
07:50:32 +0200):
They are _definitively_ worth waiting for, although I am not familiar
with the release timing. But I have been running on a dual-socket
with 8 cores and 16 SMTs. And I say they are worth waiting for.
Q1'2009 -
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Prentice Bisbal wrote:
Dell supports CentOS. They better - that's one of the OSes they will
install if you buy a cluster from them. I suspect the technician you are
dealing with doesn't even know this.
Not in my experience. Not only did they refuse to support it, the guy
Hi Håkon,
Håkon Bugge wrote:
... and, the statement below is based on comparing Harpertown to
Nehalem. I have not tested products from Intel's competitors and
compared them to Nehalem.
Do you, by any chance, have any substantial performance figure to make
us drool? :)
Cheers,
--
Kilian
Kilian CAVALOTTI wrote:
Hi Håkon,
Håkon Bugge wrote:
... and, the statement below is based on comparing Harpertown to
Nehalem. I have not tested products from Intel's competitors and
compared them to Nehalem.
Do you, by any chance, have any substantial performance figure to make
us drool?
Joe Landman wrote:
Kilian CAVALOTTI wrote:
Do you, by any chance, have any substantial performance figure to make
us drool? :)
Intel has asked that no benchmarks be published by people with units.
One wonders why they distributed them in the first place if they didn't
intend to excite
Ellis Wilson wrote:
Joe Landman wrote:
Kilian CAVALOTTI wrote:
Do you, by any chance, have any substantial performance figure to make
us drool? :)
Intel has asked that no benchmarks be published by people with units.
One wonders why they distributed them in the first place if they didn't
Joe,
If integrators have them, this means that the Nehalem release is imminent?
But when?
Ivan
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Joe Landman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kilian CAVALOTTI wrote:
Hi Håkon,
Håkon Bugge wrote:
... and, the statement below is based on comparing Harpertown to
Ivan Oleynik wrote:
Joe,
If integrators have them, this means that the Nehalem release is imminent?
You should ask Intel. We don't know.
But when?
Ivan
--
Joseph Landman, Ph.D
Founder and CEO
Scalable Informatics LLC,
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com
Ellis Wilson wrote:
Joe Landman wrote:
Kilian CAVALOTTI wrote:
Do you, by any chance, have any substantial performance figure to make
us drool? :)
Intel has asked that no benchmarks be published by people with units.
One wonders why they distributed them in the first place if they didn't
Sun has leaked some preformance figorese see
http://www.dvhardware.net/article25470.html
If you really want to drool then Intel's new 6 CORE
Dunnington will be a new 45nm processor in the Penryn family, it will feature
three dual-core banks and have 16MB of shared L3 cache memory. Each pair
21 matches
Mail list logo
