For those old enough to have heard somebody as great as
John Lennon sing that the dream is over,
and rather mediocre philosophers claim the end of history,
prophecies that were never confirmed,
reading bombastic claims that MPI is dead is not so unsettling.
After all, reports of the death of
Such a ban is kind of humorous when you consider that a large percentage of
Xeon production goes to China where they are integrated into systems built
by the contract manufacturers (Foxconn, Quanta, etc).
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Kilian Cavalotti
kilian.cavalotti.w...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/04/15 14:05, Kilian Cavalotti wrote:
If that's confirmed, that would be a big loss for Intel, both in the
short and longer terms. That after Summit, that looks like a lot to
take in.
Very easy to confirm, they are now listed (as of February 18th) as
being on the EAR entity list for
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 03:57:34PM -0400, Scott Atchley wrote:
There is concern by some and outright declaration by others (including
hardware vendors) that MPI will not scale to exascale due to issues like
rank state growing too large for 10-100 million endpoints,
That's weird, given that
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Prentice Bisbal
prentice.bis...@rutgers.edu wrote:
I got annoyed by this article and had to stop reading it. I'll go back later
and try to give it a proper critique, but obviously disagree with most of
what I've read so far. Right of the bat, the author implies
Hi all,
According to
http://www.vrworld.com/2015/04/07/usa-shocks-intel-ban-on-china-xeon-supercomputers/,
the US government has placed the 4 major China Supercomputer Centers
on the “Denial List,” which prevents “high technology from the USA” to
be sold to these sites. On claims that they are
On 09/04/15 03:16, H. Vidal, Jr. wrote:
Curious as to what the body of thought is here on this article:
Some quick random thoughts on this article from down under:
1) Whilst MPI implies HPC HPC does not necessarily imply MPI (and it
never has in my decade of doing HPC, there have always been
Curious as to what the body of thought is here on this article:
http://www.dursi.ca/hpc-is-dying-and-mpi-is-killing-it/
___
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or
I got annoyed by this article and had to stop reading it. I'll go back
later and try to give it a proper critique, but obviously disagree with
most of what I've read so far. Right of the bat, the author implies that
Big Data = HPC, and I disagree with that.
More ranting to come
Prentice
There is concern by some and outright declaration by others (including
hardware vendors) that MPI will not scale to exascale due to issues like
rank state growing too large for 10-100 million endpoints, lack of
reliability, etc. Those that make this claim then offer up their favorite
solution (a
10 matches
Mail list logo
