On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Mark Hahn h...@mcmaster.ca wrote:
AMD Opteron Shangai 6MB L3 : 90% of peak
Intel Nehalem Core i7 : 95.2% of peak
Intel Itanium 2 : 95.6% of peak
interesting numbers, and Goto's efforts are always respected.
it would be valuable to understand why, though. I
According to Kazushige Goto, these are the peak performance numbers he
obtained with Linpack and GotoBLAS, with tuning for Nehalem not yet
completed.
AMD Opteron Shangai 6MB L3 : 90% of peak
Intel Nehalem Core i7 : 95.2% of peak
Intel Itanium 2 : 95.6% of peak
It's a Core i7 but should give you
AMD Opteron Shangai 6MB L3 : 90% of peak
Intel Nehalem Core i7 : 95.2% of peak
Intel Itanium 2 : 95.6% of peak
interesting numbers, and Goto's efforts are always respected.
it would be valuable to understand why, though. I usually think
of ia64 as being basically designed specifically to make
Does someone know whether Intel has already started shipping Nehalem Xeon
55** processors? Are there system integrators that have Nehalem servers
already available for customers?
How these Xeon 55** are compared to latest AMD Shanghais (clock by clock,
performace/price)?
Ivan
Yes, Intel has provided seed units to system integrators and software
developers so they can start system and code testing.
However, those samples are covered by NDA that does not allow
performance measurements to be published, including comparisons with
competing products.
Only Intel can
Igor Kozin wrote:
Did you really hold the Nehalem Xeon chips in your hands? They probably
It would be nice to hear from you some numbers concerning Harpertown vs
Nehalem performance
those who know will not be able tell you because of the NDA.
NDA for Core i7 ended today. What's the
hows does one get on the band wagon to test out these newer processors from
intel?
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 4:19 AM, Bill Broadley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ellis Wilson wrote:
Joe Landman wrote:
Kilian CAVALOTTI wrote:
Do you, by any chance, have any substantial performance figure to make
Joe Landman wrote:
Do you, by any chance, have any substantial performance figure to make
us drool? :)
Intel has asked that no benchmarks be published by people with units.
Sounds like Intel has something to hide.
--
Prentice
___
Beowulf
They definitely must fear AMD to be faster, with good reasons.
Let's check things.
Past 12 years that i been watching reports on new cpu's intels
performance of new great cpu's
always got leaked out long before.
All we have now is some posting of a guy from which i cannot confirm
he been
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Hahn
If you really want to drool then Intel's new 6 CORE
nah. to me, it's just a density play - nothing wrong with that,
but not really interesting. if you have small-memory,
cache-friendly code,
you'll be happy, but putting 6 cores on the
i remember reading some where that they are going to be over lapping the
cores some how
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Mark Hahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you really want to drool then Intel's new 6 CORE
nah. to me, it's just a density play - nothing wrong with that,
but not really
Prentice Bisbal wrote:
Sounds like Intel has something to hide.
Nope. They just track people who talk badly about Intel and
then they send around the black helicopters and the little blue
men and the silver suit dudes will come talk to you :)
Actually this makes perfect sense for all chip
If you really want to drool then Intel's new 6 CORE
nah. to me, it's just a density play - nothing wrong with that,
but not really interesting. if you have small-memory, cache-friendly code,
you'll be happy, but putting 6 cores on the same old tired memory
is not what I'd call an HPC
Sounds like Intel has something to hide.
Often companies like Intel have an embargo date solely to make sure
that all the great new performance news arrives at once, generating a
lot of press alongside the formal announcement of availability.
I also had one case years ago where I was doing a
I feel it's a double edged sword.
Usually when intel ships a great new part, all the sites are
discussing it and 1 or 2 vague tests show up.
AMD seems to use the path you describe below.
Suddenly K7-MP 1.2ghz was there crushing P4 Xeon 1.7Ghz at the time.
Suddenly opteron was there at 2.2Ghz
- Jon Aquilina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hows does one get on the band wagon to test out these newer processors
from intel?
Talk to your local friendly Intel rep I suspect. :-)
--
Christopher Samuel - (03) 9925 4751 - Systems Manager
The Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing
They are _definitively_ worth waiting for,
although I am not familiar with the release
timing. But I have been running on a dual-socket
with 8 cores and 16 SMTs. And I say they are worth waiting for.
Håkon
At 01:57 14.10.2008, Ivan Oleynik wrote:
I am still in process of purchasing a new
Thanks, Håkon.
Did you really hold the Nehalem Xeon chips in your hands? They probably
require new motherboards with a new chipset.
It would be nice to hear from you some numbers concerning Harpertown vs
Nehalem performance.
Unfortunately, I can not wait beyond Jan 1 due to financial
Did you really hold the Nehalem Xeon chips in your hands? They probably
require new motherboards with a new chipset.
absolutely
It would be nice to hear from you some numbers concerning Harpertown vs
Nehalem performance
those who know will not be able tell you because of the NDA.
i think
... and, the statement below is based on
comparing Harpertown to Nehalem. I have not
tested products from Intel's competitors and compared them to Nehalem.
Thanks, Håkon (speaking for himself)
At 07:50 14.10.2008, Håkon Bugge wrote:
They are _definitively_ worth waiting for,
although I am
On 14 Oct 2008, at 22:00, Igor Kozin wrote:
Did you really hold the Nehalem Xeon chips in your hands? They
probably require new motherboards with a new chipset.
absolutely
It would be nice to hear from you some numbers concerning Harpertown
vs Nehalem performance
those who know will
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:00:16PM +0100, Igor Kozin wrote:
then make your choice between Barcelona and Harpertown.
if you are lucky you can get Shanghai which is expected by the end of the
year.
Those of us who ordered Shanghai's when first announced should be
getting them fairly soon. I'm
In message from Håkon Bugge [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tue, 14 Oct 2008
07:50:32 +0200):
They are _definitively_ worth waiting for, although I am not familiar
with the release timing. But I have been running on a dual-socket
with 8 cores and 16 SMTs. And I say they are worth waiting for.
Q1'2009 -
Hi Håkon,
Håkon Bugge wrote:
... and, the statement below is based on comparing Harpertown to
Nehalem. I have not tested products from Intel's competitors and
compared them to Nehalem.
Do you, by any chance, have any substantial performance figure to make
us drool? :)
Cheers,
--
Kilian
Kilian CAVALOTTI wrote:
Hi Håkon,
Håkon Bugge wrote:
... and, the statement below is based on comparing Harpertown to
Nehalem. I have not tested products from Intel's competitors and
compared them to Nehalem.
Do you, by any chance, have any substantial performance figure to make
us drool?
Joe Landman wrote:
Kilian CAVALOTTI wrote:
Do you, by any chance, have any substantial performance figure to make
us drool? :)
Intel has asked that no benchmarks be published by people with units.
One wonders why they distributed them in the first place if they didn't
intend to excite
Ellis Wilson wrote:
Joe Landman wrote:
Kilian CAVALOTTI wrote:
Do you, by any chance, have any substantial performance figure to make
us drool? :)
Intel has asked that no benchmarks be published by people with units.
One wonders why they distributed them in the first place if they didn't
Joe,
If integrators have them, this means that the Nehalem release is imminent?
But when?
Ivan
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Joe Landman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kilian CAVALOTTI wrote:
Hi Håkon,
Håkon Bugge wrote:
... and, the statement below is based on comparing Harpertown to
Ivan Oleynik wrote:
Joe,
If integrators have them, this means that the Nehalem release is imminent?
You should ask Intel. We don't know.
But when?
Ivan
--
Joseph Landman, Ph.D
Founder and CEO
Scalable Informatics LLC,
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com
Ellis Wilson wrote:
Joe Landman wrote:
Kilian CAVALOTTI wrote:
Do you, by any chance, have any substantial performance figure to make
us drool? :)
Intel has asked that no benchmarks be published by people with units.
One wonders why they distributed them in the first place if they didn't
preformance computer, as multu-cores now adding it seems faster then
moore's Law of 18 months.
--- On Tue, 10/14/08, Joe Landman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Joe Landman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Beowulf] Nehalem Xeons
To: Kilian CAVALOTTI [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Håkon Bugge [EMAIL PROTECTED
I am still in process of purchasing a new cluster and consider whether is
worth waiting for new Intel Xeons. Does someone know when Intel will start
selling Xeons based on Nehalem architecture? They announced desktop launch
(Nov 16) but were quiet about server release.
Thanks,
Ivan
32 matches
Mail list logo
