February 2021 15:53
To: Jonathan Aquilina
Cc: Beowulf
Subject: Re: [Beowulf] apline linux [EXT]
Yes. in theory, although whether it’s worthwhile presumably depends on whether
that RAM saving is significant. If you’re saving, say, 100MB on a 32 GB node,
that’s not a vast saving, especially if you’re
source usage for what you want to crunch?
Regards,
Jonathan
From: Tim Cutts mailto:t...@sanger.ac.uk>>
Sent: 01 February 2021 15:43
To: Jonathan Aquilina mailto:jaquil...@eagleeyet.net>>
Cc: Beowulf mailto:beowulf@beowulf.org>>
Subject: Re: [Beowulf] apline linux [EXT]
Th
Aquilina
Cc: Beowulf
Subject: Re: [Beowulf] apline linux [EXT]
The only place I regularly encounter is in containers, so people who are
running singularity might find their users are using alpine in a way they can’t
easily see. Presumably the libm point Janne made applies in the container
The only place I regularly encounter is in containers, so people who are
running singularity might find their users are using alpine in a way they can’t
easily see. Presumably the libm point Janne made applies in the container
context as well, since the application will presumably be using the
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 7:57 AM Jonathan Aquilina via Beowulf
wrote:
> Recently been giving alpine linux a try. I am super impressed on virtualized
> version of it what a low ram footprint it has 60mb starting. What do you guys
> think when it comes to alpine linux in the HPC space?
AFAIU the
Hey guys,
Recently been giving alpine linux a try. I am super impressed on virtualized
version of it what a low ram footprint it has 60mb starting. What do you guys
think when it comes to alpine linux in the HPC space?
Regards,
Jonathan
___
