Thanks Chris. I worked in one place which was setting up Reframe. It
looked to be complicated to get running.
Has this changed?
On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 20:09, Chris Samuel wrote:
> On 4/30/20 6:54 am, John Hearns wrote:
>
> > That is a four letter abbreviation...
>
> Ah you mean an ETLA
You can launch clck with either slurm (which means you do not need to provide a
nodefile, clck will use whatever nodes you are allocated), or with a nodefile -
which is typically more of a standalone operation when the system is in
maintenance mode.
To help solve the mpirun issue it would be
Brady,
Thanks. I probably will pick your brain more, if you don't mind as I
delve further into this.
On 4/30/2020 11:49 AM, Black, Brady P wrote:
Hi - Intel Cluster Checker person chiming in.
To answer your question Prentice about runtime of Cluster Checker (CLCK), this
will depend on
When you launch your clck jobs, do you launch them with slurm, or do you
use a nodefile? When I use a nodefile, I get an error that it can't call
mpirun on one of the nodes, or something like that. I'd provide the
exact error message, but I don't have access to it at the moment.
Prentice
On
On 4/30/20 6:54 am, John Hearns wrote:
That is a four letter abbreviation...
Ah you mean an ETLA (Extended TLA).
I've not used ICC but we do use Reframe (from CSCS) at work for testing
both between maintenances on our test system for changes we're making
and also after the maintenance as a
Dear Beowulfers,
If your clusters use Infiniband, you know there are only two types of
switches: managed or unmanaged. The former come with SSH, a web
interface, SNMP and everything ; the latter come with LEDs.
The only (and officially recommended) way to monitor unmanaged
switches is to go take
On 4/30/20 12:14 pm, John Hearns wrote:
Thanks Chris. I worked in one place which was setting up Reframe. It
looked to be complicated to get running.
Has this changed?
To be honest I am not sure, another team at NERSC set it up so I just
check out our local git repo and run it with:
Nice one, I own an HP Voltaire 4036 which is managed but am still happy to
checkout the github link.
Thanks very much for informing us as I'm sure it will be of huge use to others
users, including myself.
Kind regards,
Darren Wise
On 30 April 2020 21:57:46 BST, Kilian Cavalotti
wrote:
>Dear
That is a four letter abbreviation... Intel clearly needed to expand the
namespace.
On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 14:35, Prentice Bisbal wrote:
> Intel abbreviates the cluster checker as "clck"
> On 4/30/20 5:13 AM, Jim Cownie wrote:
>
> Bewarel of a TLA collision here. ICC is normally the Intel C
i played with it about a year ago since i get it as part of the intel
compiler bundle we pay for. it was overly complicated to install and
run and didn't seem worth while. kind of like getting a piece of ikea
furniture but then trying to use a phillips screw driver to build it
instead of the
They could go all out an apple cool on this one, add an lowercase "i" for Intel
to the beginning and have iCLCK upon the hour after though apple might sue for
IP violation issues claiming they had a new mouse coming to the market and 50
patents no-one knew about to bolster the media grabbing
Hi - Intel Cluster Checker person chiming in.
To answer your question Prentice about runtime of Cluster Checker (CLCK), this
will depend on which set of tests or framework definition (FWD) you use and the
number of servers. The default fwd, is health_base which should run in a matter
of
Intel abbreviates the cluster checker as "clck"
On 4/30/20 5:13 AM, Jim Cownie wrote:
Bewarel of a TLA collision here. ICC is normally the Intel C Compiler,
or C/C++ compiler suite (since you invoke the C compiler as “icc”). :-)
On 30 Apr 2020, at 08:37, John Hearns
Bewarel of a TLA collision here. ICC is normally the Intel C Compiler, or C/C++
compiler suite (since you invoke the C compiler as “icc”). :-)
> On 30 Apr 2020, at 08:37, John Hearns wrote:
>
> Thanks Prentice. Iw as discussing this only to days ago...
> I used the older version of ICC when
Thanks Prentice. Iw as discussing this only to days ago...
I used the older version of ICC when working at XMA int the UK.
When the version as changed I found it a lot more difficult to implement.
I looked two days ago and the project seems to be revived, and incorporated
into oneAPI
Is anyone
15 matches
Mail list logo