Re: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status & shepherd) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-03

Sure Martin, Will do. Sami Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 1, 2016, at 12:26 AM, Martin Vigoureux > wrote: > > WG, > > we have now received an answer from all the authors and to their knowledge > there is no undisclosed IPR that relates to this draft. > > Sami,

Re: [bess] MIBDoc review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-mib-02.txt

Hi authors, I saw the discussions between you and Glenn about l2l3 mvpn mib and you have already submitted the 02 version to address the comments. But I did not see any response to the below mvpn mib review and comments(maybe I missed something), given that we have plan to progress the

Re: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status & shepherd) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-03

WG, we have now received an answer from all the authors and to their knowledge there is no undisclosed IPR that relates to this draft. Sami, please update the draft and make sure that *all* the authors are identified on the submission page, with their latest address, before submitting the

Re: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status & shepherd) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-03

Hi Martin, I am not aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. Thomas -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von Martin Vigoureux Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. Mai 2016 12:54 An: BESS Betreff: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status & shepherd) for