Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-03

Hi Ali, > >Is it that besides their own default gateway, an additional common > >gateway is advertised using that extended community? If so, what's the > >purpose to call those different IP addresses on the IRB interfaces > >"default gateway"? I assume the hosts will be using the common gateway >

Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-03

Support Regards, Nabeel > On Feb 17, 2017, at 5:25 PM, Ali Sajassi (sajassi) wrote: > > Hi Jeffrey, > > Thanks for your comments, please refer inline for my responses ... > > On 2/17/17, 10:42 AM, "BESS on behalf of Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" >

Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-03

Hi, I have the following nits/questions/comments. This email is only about the asymmetric section - I may send another one about symmetric section. "inter-subnet switching" is confusing. Shouldn't it be "inter-subnet routing" instead of "intra-subnet switching"? While it's EVPN aware, it