Hi Alvaro,
Thank you for your thorough review and comments. I have addressed all of them.
Please refer inline for details on each. I just posted a new rev (rev10) that
covers all the comment resolutions addressed here.
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-10.txt
From: "Alvaro
Hi Martin and Thomas,
We would like to ask for WG adoption for this draft, as there are vendor
planned implementations for it.
Thanks,
Sami
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
This discussion (see the attached messages) really should have been
cc'ed to BESS and IDR.
--- Begin Message ---
Hello
I have been selected to do a routing directorate “early” review of this draft.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-rfc3107bis/
The routing directorate will, on
WG,
there is a clear renewed support for this document, so we'll continue as
normal.
Thank you.
M
Le 13/04/2017 à 20:04, Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
WG
Given the IPR disclosed [1] against
draft-mackie-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane, we are starting a call for
comment specifically to let people
