Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

2019-12-02 Thread Robert Raszuk
Hi Acee, Please observe that this draft defines encoding for SAFI 129 with IPv6 as next hop. If we are prepend it with zero pls do not forget to also submit the errata to RFC 6514 which says clearly in section 9.2.3.2 that next hop *field* must be set to a routable IP address. Not part of the

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

2019-12-02 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Robert, What you’re suggesting doesn’t really solve the problem that all the currently deployed routers that do not follow RFC 5549. No known implementations follow RFC 5549. Were you on the meetecho when this was presented in the BESS meeting at IETF 106? There was clear consensus in the

[bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-yang-02.txt

2019-12-02 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF. Title : Yang Data Model for Multicast in MPLS/BGP IP VPNs Authors : Yisong Liu Feng