Thanks for the update based on the latest discussion.
Please also update the text in item 4 under section 6.2, remove the text
related to the sequence number and the Leave group synchronization procedure.
Wen
From: BESS on behalf of "Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)"
Date: Tuesday, May 19,
Hi Authors,
I noticed the following text about error handling in -05:
When a PE receives an EVPN SMET route for a given (*,G), it
compares the received version flags from the route with its per-
PE stored version flags. If the PE finds that a version flag
associated
Hi Ravi,
Thanks for a thorough and useful review.
Responses in line…
> Summary:
> I have some minor concerns about this document that I think should be
> resolved before publication.
Doing so in -14
> Minor issues:
>
> Section2: During an initial reading, the terminology comes across as
Hi Ben,
Many thanks for the detailed review.
Herewith responses to your Discuss and Comments.
> DISCUSS:
> --
>
> Section 3.2.1.3 seems to talk about intermingling SFIR-RDs and
> SFIR Pool Identifiers in a common list, but I do not
