Re: [bess] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-10: (with DISCUSS)

On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 4:47 AM Adrian Farrel wrote: > Hi Warren, > > Thanks for this. I'll try to unpick it. > > > DISCUSS: > > --- > > > > I hope that I'm just misunderstanding something obvious, but I strongly > support > > John's

Re: [bess] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-11: (with COMMENT)

Thanks Murray, > COMMENT: > - > > Why is the SHOULD in Section 8 only a SHOULD? Why might I legitimately > not do what it says? I need to think about this a bit. My first reaction is that it shouldn't even use 2119 language in

[bess] The BESS WG has placed draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop in state "Adopted by a WG"

The BESS WG has placed draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop in state Adopted by a WG (entered by Stephane Litkowski) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop/ ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org

[bess] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-11: (with COMMENT)

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-11: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)