Greetings,
Errata (6875) has been deleted. Please resubmit your errata with the correct
RFC number.
Thank you.
RFC Editor/cs
> From:
> Subject: RE: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7582 (6875)
> Date: March 8, 2022 at 1:18:56 AM PST
> To: RFC Errata System
> Cc: "ero...@juniper.net" ,
I would add Luc comment as soon as window open to submit.
From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
Date: Monday, March 7, 2022 at 11:31 PM
To: Luc André Burdet , Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)
, John E Drake , The IESG
Cc: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-pr...@ietf.org
, bess-cha...@ietf.org
,
Dear Yao,
The issue is not related to support or no support of a new feature
although that is also not well addressed in current BGP-4 specification.
The question is about coexistence of multiple transports and
service encoding for the same application.
I have a separate proposal on this, but
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7582,
"Multicast Virtual Private Network (MVPN): Using Bidirectional P-Tunnels".
--
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6875
--