Re: [bess] Coverage of ERL label within LSP-Ping Mechanisms for EVPN

2023-05-17 Thread Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
Hi Nitsan, This draft has gone through the WGLC as well as IESG review and we are very close to its publication (i.e., too late to make such changes). Once it is published, we welcome enhancements and expansion to this document when needed. IETF has a formal process of reporting “errata” on a

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-wang-bess-sbfd-discriminator

2023-05-17 Thread Greg Mirsky
Hi Matthew and Stephane, as a co-author, I support adoption of this draft by the BESS WG. I am not aware of any IPR, other than already disclosed, related to this draft. Regards, Greg On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 9:39 AM wrote: > Hello, > > > > This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for >

[bess] WG adoption poll for draft-wang-bess-sbfd-discriminator

2023-05-17 Thread slitkows.ietf
Hello, This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for draft-wang-bess-sbfd-discriminator-05 [1]. Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this document, to ensure that IPR has

Re: [bess] Coverage of ERL label within LSP-Ping Mechanisms for EVPN

2023-05-17 Thread Nitsan Dolev
Dear authors of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-09 and draft-burdet-bess-evpn-fast-reroute-03, Your help with addressing the following question will be most appreciated, As these two mentioned drafts seem to be under consensus; would not it be right to address the coverage of ERL label should