Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR poll for draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-ip-aliasing-09

2023-11-14 Thread Lukas Krattiger (lkrattig)
Support as a co-author and not aware of any IPR Kind Regards -Lukas > On Nov 13, 2023, at 6:50 AM, Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang > wrote: > > Hi, > > This email begins a two-week WG adoption and IPR poll for > draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-ip-aliasing-09 >

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR poll for draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-ip-aliasing-09

2023-11-14 Thread John Drake
Support, not aware of any IPR On Tuesday, November 14, 2023 at 05:13:04 AM PST, Jorge Rabadan (Nokia) wrote: As co-author, I support the WG adoption of this document. Not aware of any relevant IPR.   Thanks. Jorge   From: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang Date: Monday, November

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR poll for draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-ip-aliasing-09

2023-11-14 Thread Jorge Rabadan (Nokia)
As co-author, I support the WG adoption of this document. Not aware of any relevant IPR. Thanks. Jorge From: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang Date: Monday, November 13, 2023 at 3:51 AM To: 'BESS' Cc: 'bess-cha...@ietf.org' , draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-ip-alias...@ietf.org Subject: WG Adoption and IPR

Re: [bess] Clarification on the draft: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc-08

2023-11-14 Thread Menachem Dodge
Hello All, Resending, as I didn’t see any response on the following query: In section 3.2 of the draft: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc-08 the “Default Flexible Xconnect” is described. Section 3.2 defines the single homing case, while section 3.2.1 describes the multihoming case. Is it allowed