Re: [bess] Mail regarding draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis

2024-02-05 Thread Menachem Dodge
Hello Ali, Thank you kindly for clarifying this, really appreciated. Best Regards, Menachem From: Ali Sajassi (sajassi) Date: Monday, 5 February 2024 at 20:06 To: Menachem Dodge , Matthew Bocci (Nokia) , draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432...@ietf.org Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org , bess@ietf.org Subject: R

Re: [bess] Mail regarding draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis

2024-02-05 Thread Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
Hi Menachem, The use of control word is not mandatory and it is situation dependent. Both RFC 7432 (and now bis) and RFC 8469 (which is basically elaboration of section 18 of RFC7432/bis) mention that the control word is not needed when there is no chance of packet re-ordering – e.g., when unde

Re: [bess] Mail regarding draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis

2024-02-05 Thread Menachem Dodge
Hello Ali, Thank you kindly for your response. The question that Mathew and I raised, is why make the control-word dependent on the presence of the Entropy Label (per RFC6790)? Transit Routers may or may not perform their load balancing based on the Entropy Label. Some transit routers do perfo