John,
Thank you very much for the detailed comments.
See the replies below to address your discussion points.
Linda
-Original Message-
From: John Scudder via Datatracker
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2024 4:19 PM
To: The IESG
Cc: draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-us...@ietf.org;
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-20: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-20: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
Hi Brian,
Thank you for reviewing the diff and my response below. I've updated it further
and posted the -10 revision:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-mcast-10
Jeffrey
Juniper Business Use Only
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
Sent:
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-mcast-10.txt is now available. It is a
work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS (BESS) WG of the IETF.
Title: EVPN Optimized Inter-Subnet Multicast (OISM) Forwarding
Authors: Wen Lin
Zhaohui Zhang
John Drake
Eric C.
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-20: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
Hi Saumya,
Not really, RFC9014 was published long ago, and there is no issue with the text
as far as I can tell. So this is not an errata but my own considerations.
Thanks.
Jorge
From: Dikshit, Saumya
Date: Tuesday, February 27, 2024 at 1:00 AM
To: Jorge Rabadan (Nokia) , BESS
Cc:
Same here;
The context of the draft is
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-over-wireless/
though the IPv6 ND registration applies to wires and cloud as well.
The game is that classical IPv6 ND is unreliable as a source to inject
information in EVPN so we end up building on
not aware of undisclosed IPR
support as co-author
Juniper Business Use Only
From: slitkows.i...@gmail.com
Date: Tuesday, 27 February 2024 at 10:41
To: bess@ietf.org ,
draft-thubert-bess-secure-evpn-mac-signal...@ietf.org
Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: WG adoption and IPR poll for
Hi,
This email begins a two-week WG adoption and IPR poll for
draft-thubert-bess-secure-evpn-mac-signaling-04
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thubert-bess-secure-evpn-mac-signali
ng/).
Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group
list.
We are also
Thanks a lot Jorge for responding as always.
Is it possible to update rfc9014 with these insinuations.
Regards,
Saumya.
From: Jorge Rabadan (Nokia) [mailto:jorge.raba...@nokia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2024 1:30 PM
To: Dikshit, Saumya ; BESS
Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: few
Hi Saumya,
Please see in-line with [jorge].
From: Dikshit, Saumya
Date: Monday, February 26, 2024 at 9:31 PM
To: BESS , Jorge Rabadan (Nokia)
Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: RE: few queries regarding rfc9014 :
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9014
CAUTION: This is an external
12 matches
Mail list logo
