Btw, the other problem with “two RTs” scheme might be mobility. The leaf
MAC-VRF can’t see each others sequence numbers for a MAC. Please
see/consider my prior email. Need to address E-Tree for non-MPLS encaps
and in DC settings (think PVLAN).
Cheers,
Aldrin
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 11:42 PM
Hi guys,
If we instead consider that the two-RTs scheme from operator point-of-view
is really a Root-only and Leaf-only MAC-VRF scheme (vs mixed root/leaf
MAC-VRF). Suppose all routes from a leaf VRF are marked with a “leaf
indication”. Suppose we use only one RT where leaf MAC-VRF rejects any
+1. Support fully.
Cheers,
Aldrin
On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 7:57 PM Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) <
wim.henderi...@nokia.com> wrote:
> support
>
> On 11/01/2018, 10:50, "BESS on behalf of Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia -
> US/Mountain View)"
Support this document for publication as an RFC. Not aware of any IPR that
relates to this document.
Cheers,
Aldrin
From: Aldrin Isaac <ais...@juniper.net>
Date: Friday, June 16, 2017 at 6:09 PM
To: Ravi Shekhar <rshek...@juniper.net>, "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain
V
I support to move this document forward to publication. There are no
IPR that I am aware of related to this document.
Apologies for leaving out IPR statement.
Regards -- Aldrin
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:52 PM Aldrin Isaac <aldrin.is...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Yes. I suppor
Yes -- support for publication.
Cheers,
Aldrin
Sent using OWA for iPhone
From: Ravi Shekhar
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 11:46:10 AM
To: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View); EXT - thomas.mo...@orange.com;
BESS;
Yes. I support to move this forward.
Regards -- Aldrin
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 3:39 PM UTTARO, JAMES wrote:
> *Fully support as co-author..I am not aware of any IPR related to this
> document..*
>
>
>
> *Thanks,*
>
> *Jim Uttaro*
>
>
>
> *From:* BESS
I would also like to indicate my support.
Cheers,Aldrin
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 6:58 AM -0800, "Thomas Morin"
wrote:
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-01 [1] as a working group
Support.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:38 AM Nabeel Cocker
wrote:
> support
>
> thanks
> Nabeel
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 4:45 AM, Thomas Morin
> wrote:
>
>> Hello working group,
>>
>> This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
>>
Support as well.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 5:37 AM -0700, "Martin Vigoureux"
wrote:
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 [1] as a Working Group
Document.
Please state on
I support as co-author. Not aware of any related IPR.
Cheers,
Aldrin
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 12:51 AM Thomas Morin
wrote:
> Hello Working Group,
>
> This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree [1] which is considered mature and ready for
Support as co-author. IETF should adopt this use-case -- optimized
multi-destination forwarding for overlays where multicast support is not
available in the underlay. I am not aware of any related IPR.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:12 AM Thomas Morin
wrote:
> Hello working
Support as co-author. Unaware of any related IPR.
Cheers,
Aldrin
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Martin Vigoureux
martin.vigour...@alcatel-lucent.com wrote:
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree [1] as a working group item.
Support.
On Monday, January 26, 2015, Martin Vigoureux
martin.vigour...@alcatel-lucent.com wrote:
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-integ [1] as a working group item.
Please send comments to the list and state if you
14 matches
Mail list logo