Re: [bess] Second WG Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-proxy-arp-nd-06

2019-06-07 Thread Yu Tianpeng
Dear WG, support this is useful optimization mechanism and has couple of known implementations and well documented. Thanks, Tim On Fri, 7 Jun 2019, 10:07 Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB), < matthew.bo...@nokia.com> wrote: > WG > > > > We ran a working group last call on this draft in August 2018.

[bess] Comments on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-yang-07

2019-03-29 Thread Yu Tianpeng
Hi authors, Thanks a lot for the -07 version of EVPN yang, which fixes many points ever raised in the mail list also some we did not notice. This version moves this document a big step forward. Thanks for the presentation and update in 104 also. Related with the P-tunnel been discussed before, I

Re: [bess] A short question on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-yang-07

2019-03-13 Thread Yu Tianpeng
Hi Sasha, If you read the beginning of even yang, it has a common leaf which indicating it is IR or P2MP. But it is globally not per EVI. So actually I also have a comment here I may forgot to mention in previous email is that this common leaf should be per EVI basis not globally. If this info

Re: [bess] Review on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-yang-06

2019-03-03 Thread Yu Tianpeng
he new version of the draft. > > > > Regards, > > Sasha > > > > Office: +972-39266302 > > Cell: +972-549266302 > > Email: alexander.vainsht...@ecitele.com > > > > *From:* Luc Andre Burdet (lburdet) > *Sent:* Sunday, March 3, 2019 3:0

Re: [bess] Request for version update of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-yang

2019-02-21 Thread Yu Tianpeng
Hi, Haven't got time to read through but had a quick look on what is newly added, there are couple of issues: 1. 7432 clearly defines usage of control word usage, cw is not sth dedicated to vpws I have to point out. 2. Type of control word should be boolean instead of empty. Another one is I

Re: [bess] A question on CE behavior on traffic forwarding to EVPN multihomed PEs in single-active mode

2019-02-13 Thread Yu Tianpeng
I guess it worth clarify CE using LAG or L2 switching to connect to PE in the question. Thanks Tim On Wed, 13 Feb 2019, 07:51 Mrinmoy Ghosh (mrghosh) Hi Jaikumar, > > > > EVPN Single active heavily depends upon MAC Flush mechanism like MVRP or > TCN Flush. > > > > In your topology, initially

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-salam-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-01

2019-02-06 Thread Yu Tianpeng
Support this important work. Thanks, Tim On Wed, 6 Feb 2019, 10:23 Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) < matthew.bo...@nokia.com wrote: > This email begins a two-week poll for adoption of > draft-salam-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-01.txt > > > > Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS

Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment

2019-01-11 Thread Yu Tianpeng
read comment 5 again. TBH for the others I don’t worry too much as they are wording optimization to avoid confusion. Comments below inline. Thanks for understanding. Regards, Tim 发件人: Ali Sajassi (sajassi) [mailto:saja...@cisco.com] 发送时间: 2019年1月12日 3:50 收件人: Yu Tianpeng; jorge.raba

Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment

2019-01-09 Thread Yu Tianpeng
Thanks a lot Ali for the updating. Looks fine for me apart from one point. Correct me if I am wrong for what mentioned below. This document aims to enable capability of evpn to be used on ENNI. But ENNI also have EVPL, ELAN and ETREE services. This document have a brilliant solution, but overall

Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment

2019-01-07 Thread Yu Tianpeng
Indeed, confused me when first read as hundreds and thousands are really just example and no particular identification on real number an implement should support. On Fri, 7 Dec 2018, 16:57 Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) Support. > > > > > > But I would be happy to see some changes if WG / Author