subject:"\[bess\] \[Idr\] draft\-rosen\-mpls\-rfc3107bis"

Re: [bess] [Idr] draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis

2016-04-01 Thread Robert Raszuk

Hi AC, I am much less concern if we must be stuck to 3107 till retirement. I think it would be much smoother on many levels to leave 3107 as is and propose better solution for interdomain label exchange with BGP in new RFC. With time we can obsolete 3107. Such model has been done in the past

Re: [bess] [Idr] draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis

2016-04-01 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)

Hi Robert, I think this would defeat the purpose of clarifying RFC 3101 multi-label behavior in a BIS draft. Let’s see if we can reach consensus first. Thanks, Acee From: Idr > on behalf of Robert Raszuk