Re: [bess] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8214 (7562)

2024-02-09 Thread Jorge Rabadan (Nokia)
...@gmail.com , saja...@cisco.com , ssa...@cisco.com , John Drake , Jorge Rabadan (Nokia) Subject: Re: [bess] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8214 (7562) CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information

Re: [bess] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8214 (7562)

2024-02-09 Thread John Scudder
Hi BESS WG, RFC 8214 authors, errata submitter, I was looking at this erratum against RFC 8214, https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7562 The erratum proposes making the following change — OLD: In a multihoming All-Active scenario, there is no Designated Forwarder (DF) election, and all

[bess] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8214 (7562)

2023-07-13 Thread RFC Errata System
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8214, "Virtual Private Wire Service Support in Ethernet VPN". -- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7562 -- Type: Technical