-domain-op...@ietf.org;
rfc7432...@ietf.org; wang.yub...@zte.com.cn
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [bess] Discussion on rfc7432bis and
draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-inter-domain-opt-b
Hi Sasha,
About your suggestion on 7432bis, it’s kind of implicit, but I see no harm in
adding a sentence.
Thanks
, rfc7432...@ietf.org
, wang.yub...@zte.com.cn
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [bess] Discussion on rfc7432bis and
draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-inter-domain-opt-b
CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links
or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [bess] Discussion on rfc7432bis and
draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-inter-domain-opt-b
Hi Sasha,
However, neither 7432bis nor any other RFC or standard I am aware of says that
the same IP address PE address of the PE MUST (or, at least, SHOULD) be used as
the Administrator
: bess@ietf.org ,
draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-inter-domain-op...@ietf.org
, rfc7432...@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [bess] Discussion on rfc7432bis and
draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-inter-domain-opt-b
CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links
or opening
:王玉保10045807;
抄送人:draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-inter-domain-op...@ietf.org;rfc7432...@ietf.org;bess@ietf.org;jorge.raba...@nokia.com;
日 期 :2023年05月15日 16:09
主 题 :RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [bess] Discussion on rfc7432bis and
draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-inter-domain-opt-b
Yubao,
Please note that an EVPN PE
@ietf.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [bess] Discussion on rfc7432bis and
draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-inter-domain-opt-b
Hi Jorge,
I think the description in draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-inter-domain-opt-b is OK.
But I don't know why the RD of AD per ES route is limited to type 1 RD. That's
why I talk about
e Rabadan (Nokia)
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2023 7:23 PM
To: wang.yub...@zte.com.cn;
draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-inter-domain-op...@ietf.org; rfc7432...@ietf.org
Cc: bess@ietf.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [bess] Discussion on rfc7432bis and
draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-inter-domain-opt-b
Hi Yubao,
Thanks for