Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-fat-pw-bgp-03: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-fat-pw-bgp/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for the work on this document. I have two very small editorial nits: > Abstract > > This draft defines protocol extensions required to synchronize flow > label states among PEs when using the BGP-based signaling procedures. Please expand "PE". ยง3: > A PE MAY support the configuration of the flow label (T and R bits) > on a per-service (e.g. VPLS VFI) basis. Please add a comma after "e.g." _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
