Re: [bess] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-12

ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree....@ietf.org>>, "bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" <bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-12 I was referring to this document being marked as Updatin

Re: [bess] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-12

ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree....@ietf.org>>, "bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" <bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-

Re: [bess] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-12

ee@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree@ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree....@ietf.org>>, "bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" <bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>> Subject: R

Re: [bess] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-12

-etree@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree@ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree....@ietf.org>>, "bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" <bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>> Subject:

Re: [bess] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-12

<draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree....@ietf.org>>, "bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" <bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-12 Ali: Hi! So, you're re

Re: [bess] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-12

Thanks Ali. General Ack to all your responses, make sense. A follow-up question, though: I notice “Reserved” in a few places. For example in Figure 4, which seems to make sense as the Reserved is a Must Be Zero (MBZ) However, on the Flags, it says: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Re: [bess] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-12

Hi Carlos, Thanks for your review and comments. Please see inline for my responses. On 8/7/17, 2:46 PM, "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" > wrote: Reviewer: Carlos Pignataro Review result: Has Issues Reviewer: Carlos Pignataro Review result: Has Nits

[bess] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-12

Reviewer: Carlos Pignataro Review result: Has Issues Reviewer: Carlos Pignataro Review result: Has Nits (and one potential Issue) I am the OPS-DIR reviewer and in general I do not have operational concerns with this document. The main issue I have is in regards to the redefinition of the MSB of