All,
this poll has ended. Although an IPR disclosure came during the poll I
did not see any change wrt to the support of this document.
We thus have a new WG document.
Authors, please republish as draft-ietf-bess-service-chaining-00
Thank you
Le 22/02/2016 17:58, EXT Martin Vigoureux a écrit
kia.com>>,
"bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" mailto:bess@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-fm-bess-service-chaining-02
Hi Martin,
As one of the authors of this draft, I support its adoption. I am not aware of
any rel
Hi,
Support.
Regards,
Nagendra
>
>On 2/22/16, 8:58 AM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux"
> wrote:
>
>>Hello working group,
>>
>>This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
>>draft-fm-bess-service-chaining-02 [1] as a working group Document.
>>
>>Please state on the list if you support adop
>Support.
Cheers,
-G.
>
>
>On 2/22/16, 8:58 AM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux"
> wrote:
>
>>Hello working group,
>>
>>This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
>>draft-fm-bess-service-chaining-02 [1] as a working group Document.
>>
>>Please state on the list if you support adoption or n
Support.
--
Cheers,
Rajiv
-Original Message-
From: BESS on behalf of Rex Fernando
Date: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 at 12:07 PM
To: "martin.vigour...@nokia.com" , "bess@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-fm-bess-service-chaining-02
>H
Hi Martin,
As one of the authors of this draft, I support its adoption. I am not aware of
any related IPR apart from the ones that have been disclosed.
Cheers,
Rex
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
Hi Martin,
As co-author, I support adoption of this draft. I am not aware of any
related IPR apart from the ones that have been disclosed.
Thanks,
-Dhananjaya
On 2/22/16, 8:58 AM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux"
wrote:
>Hello working group,
>
>This email starts a two-week poll on ado
FYI, the disclosure has been made March 8th:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2765/
-Thomas
Le 07/03/2016 13:35, Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
Hello Dhananjaya,
thanks for the notice.
WG,
I'll let this poll run for at least a week after the disclosure is made.
For those who have already stated t
FYI, the disclosure has been made March 8th:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2765/
-Thomas
Le 07/03/2016 13:35, Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
Hello Dhananjaya,
thanks for the notice.
WG,
I'll let this poll run for at least a week after the disclosure is made.
For those who have already stated t
Hello Dhananjaya,
thanks for the notice.
WG,
I'll let this poll run for at least a week after the disclosure is made.
For those who have already stated their position please do not hesitate
to communicate a revised position, if desired, in light of this upcoming
IPR disclosure.
For the rest,
Hello Martin, WG,
It came to our notice recently that there was an old IPR filing on an
earlier related draft that had not been submitted to the IETF. An IPR
statement has now been submitted and is in progress. This was an
inadvertent oversight, and we apologize for the late disclosure.
Regards,
is a really good starting point
Adrian
> -Original Message-
> From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Vigoureux
> Sent: 22 February 2016 16:59
> To: bess@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-fm-bess-service-chain...@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: [bess] Poll for adopt
...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-fm-bess-service-chaining-02
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-fm-bess-service-chaining-02 [1] as a working group Document.
Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases
I am not aware of any IPR
Maria
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 23, 2016, at 8:06 AM, Bruno Rijsman wrote:
>
> The only IPR of which I am personally aware of is the 2284 disclosure
> mentioned below.
>
>
>
>> On 2/22/16, 8:58 AM, "Martin Vigoureux" wrote:
>>
>> Hello working group,
>>
>> Th
The only IPR of which I am personally aware of is the 2284 disclosure
mentioned below.
On 2/22/16, 8:58 AM, "Martin Vigoureux" wrote:
>Hello working group,
>
>This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
>draft-fm-bess-service-chaining-02 [1] as a working group Document.
>
>Please state on th
As co-author, I support adoption of this draft. I am not aware of any IPR
relating to this draft apart from that filed by Ericsson and reported to the
IETF at the following URL:
-
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?draft=draft-fm-bess-service-chaining&submit=draft&rfc=&doctitle=&group=&ho
Hi Martin,
I'm not aware of any related and undisclosed IPR.
(and yes, as a co-author, I certainly support adoption!)
-Thomas
Martin Vigoureux :
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-fm-bess-service-chaining-02 [1] as a working group Document.
Please state
Hi Wim,
Thanks again for the support and your suggestions. I believe we did
address them in the latest version, but I¹ll check again.
Regards,
-Dhananjaya
On 2/22/16, 12:54 PM, "BESS on behalf of Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)"
wrote:
>I support adoption as WG doc but none of my questions have
I support adoption as WG doc but none of my questions have been addressed so far
On 22/02/16 17:58, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" wrote:
>Hello working group,
>
>This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
>draft-fm-bess-service-chaining-02 [1] as a working group Document.
>
>Please
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-fm-bess-service-chaining-02 [1] as a working group Document.
Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases,
please also state the reasons).
This poll runs until *the 7th of March*.
Note that IPR
20 matches
Mail list logo
