Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-02

2015-09-30 Thread Alvaro Retana (aretana)
On 9/30/15, 2:34 AM, "thomas.mo...@orange.com" > wrote: Thomas: Hi! . . . Current: The label may be shared with other P-tunnels, subject to the anti-ambiguity rules for extranet

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-02

2015-09-29 Thread Alvaro Retana (aretana)
On 9/28/15, 10:39 AM, "thomas.mo...@orange.com" > wrote: Jeffrey/Thomas: Hi! First of all, please note that the Gen-ART review that came in today had the same comment about the Normative references…which

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-02

2015-09-28 Thread thomas.morin
Hi Alvaro, [resending, because I had mailer daemon from junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com] 2015-09-24, Alvaro Retana (aretana): Also, some of the text [...] may not be accesible to the average reader,... As a side note, while what you wrote is true, I would say that it will be hard to fix.

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-02

2015-09-28 Thread thomas.morin
Jeffrey, all, [resending this one too...] (below) 2015-09-25, Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang: *From:*Alvaro Retana (aretana) [mailto:aret...@cisco.com] 5. Section 4. (Security Considerations) Are there really no security considerations? * Section 3.1. (Control State) Says that: "To

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-02

2015-09-28 Thread thomas.morin
Hi Alvaro, 2015-09-24, Alvaro Retana (aretana): Also, some of the text [...] may not be accesible to the average reader,... As a side note, while what you wrote is true, I would say that it will be hard to fix. Most mVPN-related specs are deemed to remain fairly inaccessible to somebody not

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-02

2015-09-28 Thread thomas.morin
Jeffrey, all, (below) 2015-09-25, Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang: *From:*Alvaro Retana (aretana) [mailto:aret...@cisco.com] 5. Section 4. (Security Considerations) Are there really no security considerations? * Section 3.1. (Control State) Says that: "To speed up

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-02

2015-09-25 Thread Alvaro Retana (aretana)
On 9/25/15, 2:11 PM, "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" > wrote: Jeffrey: Hi! . . . Major: 1. I-D.ietf-bess-ir and I-D.ietf-bess-mvpn-extranet should be Normative References. Zzh> Done. I-D.ietf-bess-ir wasn’t moved. . . . 1. Section 4. (Security