[bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon-01.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF. Title : EVPN Multi-Homing Extensions for Split Horizon Filtering Authors : Jorge Rabadan

[bess] draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label-05 shepherd's review

Hi, Here is my review of the document: Section 2.2: s/the DCB MUST not intersect/the DCB MUST NOT intersect/ I don't fully understand the purpose of the second part of the sentence : "or those routers MUST be considered as part of the "domain"." I think the DCB must not intersect with any

[bess] draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df-07 => waiting for vES

Hi authors, I have completed my shepherd's write up of the document. However, there is a normative reference to vES draft which we haven't closed yet. I'll hold on the doc, until we have moved forward vES. It should be closed soon I think. We'll send both together to IESG. Thanks for your

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-brissette-bess-evpn-l2gw-proto

As co-author I support adoption. I am aware of an IPR which is in process of being disclosed. Regards, Dan From: BESS on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" Date: Monday, March 29, 2021 at 3:13 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Subject: [EXT][bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for

[bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-07.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF. Title : IGMP and MLD Proxy for EVPN Authors : Ali Sajassi Samir Thoria

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-brissette-bess-evpn-l2gw-proto

Hi Gyan, RFC8584 talks about all-active which sometime is referred as active-active per flow where a host is reachable via both MH PE. The L2GW protocol draft is completely different. It is about single-active per flow load balancing where a host is reachable via a single MH PE at a time.

[bess] New short WGLC for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-07

Hi WG, We got final updates from authors on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy. I'm opening a new short Working Group Last Call (to be closed on 4/19) to get any last comments before moving the document to IESG. Feel free to send comments to the list before next Monday. Thanks,

Re: [bess] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

And as shared John’s concern, the new text looks like fixing the problem Thank for having updated the document -éric From: iesg on behalf of John Scudder Date: Monday, 12 April 2021 at 19:39 To: Donald Eastlake Cc: Matthew Bocci , "bess-cha...@ietf.org" ,

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-brissette-bess-evpn-l2gw-proto

Support the adoption. Thanks, Jim Uttaro From: BESS On Behalf Of Aparna Pattekar (apjoshi) Sent: Friday, April 09, 2021 4:17 PM To: slitkows.i...@gmail.com Cc: bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-brissette-bess-evpn-l2gw-proto Support the

[bess] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-08: (with COMMENT)

John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-08: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please

Re: [bess] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Thanks for hopping threads, I shoulda caught that last one. Your proposed change looks fine, I’ll remove my DISCUSS in anticipation of you issuing a new version. (One nit on your new text, “in order maximize” should be “in order to maximize”.) —John On Apr 12, 2021, at 1:03 PM, Donald

Re: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-09.txt

This revision has changes to resolve IESG comments and one DISCUSS, Thanks, Donald === Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA d3e...@gmail.com On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 5:27 PM wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is

[bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-09.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF. Title : EVPN Operations, Administration and Maintenance Requirements and Framework Authors : Samer Salam

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-brissette-bess-evpn-l2gw-proto

Hi Patrice Makes sense. That is a very important use case for for operators for SHD, SHN scenario for more granular per flow versus per VLAN DF election and load balancing. So this draft is an optimization for SHD, SHN per flow load balancing updating RFC 7432, similar to RFC 8584 MHD, MHN

Re: [bess] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi John, I've posted -09 which should resolve your DISCUSS and COMMENTs. Thanks, Donald === Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA d3e...@gmail.com On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 1:38 PM John Scudder wrote: > Thanks

Re: [bess] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-08: (with COMMENT)

Hi Rob, I have posted a -09 revision which should resolve your COMMENTs. Thanks, Donald === Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA d3e...@gmail.com On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 6:58 AM Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote:

Re: [bess] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-08: (with COMMENT)

Hi Eric, I have posted revision -09 which should resolve your COMMENTs except possible that I decided not to include a statement that EVPN OAM MAY use IOAM or the like. As I say, there are lots of things it MAY use... Thanks, Donald === Donald E. Eastlake 3rd