Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-01

[Neeraj Malhotra]

Hi,

Thanks Stephane. Will update very soon.

Neeraj

> On Feb 11, 2021, at 12:20 AM, slitkows.i...@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Authors,
>  
> Please address the comments raised by the WG members before we move forward.
> I have fixed the dependency to the individual draft, so now the IPR appears 
> on the WG doc.
>  
> Brgds,
>  
> Stephane
>  
>  
> From: Acee Lindem (acee)  
> Sent: lundi 18 janvier 2021 18:25
> To: slitkows.i...@gmail.com; bess@ietf.org
> Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for 
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-01
>  
> Hi Stephane, et al,
> I did another quick read of the draft and I support publication. I think it 
> would be good to state in the introduction which sections of the draft our 
> normative and which are informative.
> Thanks,
> Acee
>  
> From: BESS  on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" 
> 
> Date: Monday, January 18, 2021 at 3:58 AM
> To: "bess@ietf.org" 
> Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" 
> Subject: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for 
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-01
>  
> This email starts a two-week working group last call for 
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-01 [1]
>  
>  
>  
> Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please 
> indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track RFC.
>  
>  
>  
> This poll runs until February 1st.
>  
>  
>  
> We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this 
> Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR 
> rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>  
> If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this document please 
> respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any 
> relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from 
> all the Authors and Contributors.
>  
> There is currently no IPR disclosed.
>  
> In addition, we are polling for knowledge of implementations of this draft, 
> per the BESS policy in [2].   
>  
>  
> Thank you,
>  
> Matthew & Stephane
>  
> [1] 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility/
> [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw
>  
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

[bess] bess - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 110

["IETF Secretariat"]

Dear Matthew Bocci,

The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled.
Below is the scheduled session information followed by
the original request. 


bess Session 1 (2:00 requested)
Wednesday, 10 March 2021, Session I 1300-1500
Room Name: Room 5 size: 505
-


iCalendar: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/110/sessions/bess.ics

Request Information:


-
Working Group Name: BGP Enabled ServiceS
Area Name: Routing Area
Session Requester: Matthew Bocci


Number of Sessions: 1
Length of Session(s):  2 Hours
Number of Attendees: 100
Conflicts to Avoid: 
 Chair Conflict: idr nvo3
 Technology Overlap: spring sfc mpls pim bier pals
 Key Participant Conflict: i2rs





People who must be present:
  Mankamana Prasad Mishra
  Martin Vigoureux
  Matthew Bocci
  Stephane Litkowski

Resources Requested:

Special Requests:
  
-


___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess