Hi Wim,
Stephane had alerted me to these comments you made a while ago, but which I
missed at the time. Sorry for the delay in getting back to you.
* The doc is much focused on the VRF constructions and architecture, but in
some use cases we need to program the SF, which is not always clear a
Hi Andy,
I‘m struggling to make the connection, since draft-ietf-bess-service-chaining
is specifically about how to do service chaining without needing a new protocol
like NSH, so SFF labels would never be used.
In draft-ietf-bess-service-chaining , if MPLS transport were used between
Service
Support as contributor – I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR.
Stuart
-914 886 2534
From: BESS on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com"
Date: Monday, January 21, 2019 at 5:06 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org"
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for
draft-i
protocols.
Obviously this work should receive review in the SFC working group, but it also
is very relevant to BESS.
You can find the draft at
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mackie-sfc-using-virtual-networking
Thanks,
Stuart
……..
Stuart Mackie
SDN/NFV Architect
+1 914 886
As co-author, I support adoption of this draft. I am not aware of any IPR
relating to this draft apart from that filed by Ericsson and reported to the
IETF at the following URL:
-
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?draft=draft-fm-bess-service-chaining&submit=draft&rfc=&doctitle=&group=&ho
As a contributer, I support adoption.
I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this document.
Stuart
-914 886 2534
From: BESS on behalf of Tony Przygienda
Date: Monday, March 6, 2017 at 12:02 PM
To: Martin Vigoureux
Cc: "draft-mackie-bess-nsh-bgp-control-pl...@ietf.org"
, "bess
We would like continue draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system.
It provides a useful description of the architecture, but the current draft is
prescriptive/normative about the content of XMPP stanzas. We would like to
change this to showing the XMPP stanzas as examples of how a solution could be
implemente
