[bess] Fw:New Version Notification for draft-lz-bess-srv6-service-capability-00.txt

2021-06-25 Thread liu.yao71
Hi all, We have uploaded a new draft on "SRv6-based BGP Service Capability" . This draft describes the problems that may be encountered during the deployment of SRv6-based BGP services, mainly in the SRv6 and MPLS co-existance scenario, and the possible solutions. Any comments and suggestions

Re: [bess] Please send slot request for IETF 111

2021-07-02 Thread liu.yao71
Hi Mankamana, I would like request a 10 minute slot for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lz-bess-srv6-service-capability-00. It describes the problems that may be encountered when deploying SRv6 BGP services in the co-existence scenario and the possible solutions. Thanks,

Re: [bess] Fw:New Version Notification for draft-lz-bess-srv6-service-capability-00.txt

2021-06-29 Thread liu.yao71
Hello Eduard, Thanks for your comments. Please see in line Yao>>. Regards, Yao --原始邮件-- 发件人:EduardMetz 抄送人:bess@ietf.org; 日 期 :2021年06月29日 16:08 主 题 :Re: [bess] Fw:New Version Notification for draft-lz-bess-srv6-service-capability-00.txt Hello Yao, I think

Re: [bess] draft-lp-bess-vpn-interworking

2022-01-03 Thread liu.yao71
Hi Adrian, Thanks for your interest and suggestion. We'll read this RFC. Best Regards, Yao --原始邮件-- 发件人:AdrianFarrel 收件人:draft-lp-bess-vpn-interwork...@ietf.org; 抄送人:bess@ietf.org; 日 期 :2022年01月03日 17:24 主 题 :draft-lp-bess-vpn-interworking Hi authors of

Re: [bess] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2022-03-07 Thread liu.yao71
Hi Robert, Thanks for sharing your detailed consideration on BGP capability and new NLRI. A few comments about the BGP capability solution. Please see inline [YAO]. == In BGP protocol any new service deployment using

Re: [bess] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2022-02-16 Thread liu.yao71
Hi, Ron and John both mentioned that leveraging the existing AFI/SAFI may cause misunderstanding of the SRv6 service routes. We encountered this problem during implementation and submitted a draft talking about this. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lz-bess-srv6-service-capability-02

Re: [bess] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2022-02-16 Thread liu.yao71
Hi, Ron and John both mentioned that leveraging the existing AFI/SAFI may cause misunderstanding of the SRv6 service routes. We encountered this problem during implementation and submitted a draft talking about this.

[bess] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-lp-bess-vpn-interworking-02.txt

2023-09-19 Thread liu.yao71
Hi All, We've submitted a new version of draft-lp-bess-vpn-interworking. It's an informational draft that proposes a label-saving method for inter-as option B in the MPLS/SRv6 interworking scenario. Your review and comment are more than welcome! Regards, Yao Original From:

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args-02

2023-10-06 Thread liu.yao71
I support the WG adoption of this draft. It's an important update for RFC9252 and benifits the implementation. Regards, Yao___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] from authors of https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saum-evpn-lsp-ping-extension/

2024-03-19 Thread liu.yao71
Hi Saumya, Thanks for the interest of draft-liu-6man-icmp-verification ! Sure we can coordinate on it. Regards, Yao Original From: Dikshit,Saumya To: draft-liu-6man-icmp-verificat...@ietf.org ; Cc: BESS ; Date: 2024年03月19日 16:10 Subject: from authors of

Re: [bess] from authors of https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saum-evpn-lsp-ping-extension/

2024-03-19 Thread liu.yao71
Hi Saumya, I have had a quick read of the draft, but to be honest, I'm not that familiar with many details in EVPN, so I need more time to go through the draft detailedly and as well as RFC9489 I suppose. Thanks, Yao Original From: Dikshit,Saumya To: 刘尧00165286; Cc:

[bess] Are data plane connectivity checks required for SRv6 EVPN just like MPLS(RFC9489)?

2024-03-20 Thread liu.yao71
Hi BESS, RFC9489 in BESS proposes the data plane connectivity check mechanism for MPLS EVPN/PBB-EVPN using MPLS lspping. As we know, now there're EVPN services based SRv6 as well. Do you see the requirement for data plane connectivity check in SRv6 EVPN as well? We have a draft