Hi all,
We have uploaded a new draft on "SRv6-based BGP Service Capability" .
This draft describes the problems that may be encountered during the deployment
of SRv6-based BGP services, mainly in the SRv6 and MPLS co-existance scenario,
and the possible solutions.
Any comments and suggestions
Hi Mankamana,
I would like request a 10 minute slot for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lz-bess-srv6-service-capability-00.
It describes the problems that may be encountered when deploying SRv6 BGP
services in the co-existence scenario and the possible solutions.
Thanks,
Hello Eduard,
Thanks for your comments.
Please see in line Yao>>.
Regards,
Yao
--原始邮件--
发件人:EduardMetz
抄送人:bess@ietf.org;
日 期 :2021年06月29日 16:08
主 题 :Re: [bess] Fw:New Version Notification for
draft-lz-bess-srv6-service-capability-00.txt
Hello Yao,
I think
Hi Adrian,
Thanks for your interest and suggestion.
We'll read this RFC.
Best Regards,
Yao
--原始邮件--
发件人:AdrianFarrel
收件人:draft-lp-bess-vpn-interwork...@ietf.org;
抄送人:bess@ietf.org;
日 期 :2022年01月03日 17:24
主 题 :draft-lp-bess-vpn-interworking
Hi authors of
Hi Robert,
Thanks for sharing your detailed consideration on BGP capability and new NLRI.
A few comments about the BGP capability solution. Please see inline [YAO].
==
In BGP protocol any new service deployment using
Hi,
Ron and John both mentioned that leveraging the existing AFI/SAFI may cause
misunderstanding of the SRv6 service routes.
We encountered this problem during implementation and submitted a draft talking
about this.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lz-bess-srv6-service-capability-02
Hi,
Ron and John both mentioned that leveraging the existing AFI/SAFI may cause
misunderstanding of the SRv6 service routes.
We encountered this problem during implementation and submitted a draft talking
about this.
Hi All,
We've submitted a new version of draft-lp-bess-vpn-interworking.
It's an informational draft that proposes a label-saving method for inter-as
option B in the MPLS/SRv6 interworking scenario.
Your review and comment are more than welcome!
Regards,
Yao
Original
From:
I support the WG adoption of this draft. It's an important update for RFC9252
and benifits the implementation.
Regards,
Yao___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
Hi Saumya,
Thanks for the interest of draft-liu-6man-icmp-verification !
Sure we can coordinate on it.
Regards,
Yao
Original
From: Dikshit,Saumya
To: draft-liu-6man-icmp-verificat...@ietf.org
;
Cc: BESS ;
Date: 2024年03月19日 16:10
Subject: from authors of
Hi Saumya,
I have had a quick read of the draft, but to be honest, I'm not that familiar
with many details in EVPN, so I need more time to go through the draft
detailedly and as well as RFC9489 I suppose.
Thanks,
Yao
Original
From: Dikshit,Saumya
To: 刘尧00165286;
Cc:
Hi BESS,
RFC9489 in BESS proposes the data plane connectivity check mechanism for MPLS
EVPN/PBB-EVPN using MPLS lspping.
As we know, now there're EVPN services based SRv6 as well.
Do you see the requirement for data plane connectivity check in SRv6 EVPN as
well?
We have a draft
12 matches
Mail list logo