Re: [bess] DF election rule in EVPN MH, for untagged interface - reg

2019-04-05 Thread Jaikumar Somasundaram
Thanks a lot Jorge. Thanks & Regards Jaikumar S From: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 11:11 AM To: Jaikumar Somasundaram ; bess@ietf.org Cc: P Muthu Arul Mozhi Subject: Re: [bess] DF election rule in EVPN MH, for untagged interface - reg Hi, I think

[bess] DF election rule in EVPN MH, for untagged interface - reg

2019-04-04 Thread Jaikumar Somasundaram
Hi All, RFC7432, section 8.5, talks about DF election algorithm (service carving algorithm) only for for VLAN-based service or for VLAN-(aware) bundle service. But there wont be any vlan id for untagged interface and so I wonder how the service carving algorithm can be applied to elect the DF

Re: [bess] A question on using EVPN label and Alias label in load balancing

2019-02-18 Thread Jaikumar Somasundaram
Thanks a lot Jide, for the reply. Please find my response below [Jai] Thanks & Regards Jaikumar S From: Jide Akintola Sent: Monday, February 18, 2019 5:00 PM To: bess@ietf.org; Jaikumar Somasundaram Subject: Re: [bess] A question on using EVPN label and Alias label in load balancing

[bess] A question on using EVPN label and Alias label in load balancing

2019-02-18 Thread Jaikumar Somasundaram
Hi All, -- || PORT1 | DEVICE1 |PORT3 --| PE1|- | 1/5| 2.2.2.2 | 1/4 | | || | | -

Re: [bess] A question on CE behavior on traffic forwarding to EVPN multihomed PEs in single-active mode

2019-02-13 Thread Jaikumar Somasundaram
Thanks Mrinmoy for the quick answer. Thanks & Regards Jaikumar S From: Mrinmoy Ghosh (mrghosh) Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 1:21 PM To: Jaikumar Somasundaram ; bess@ietf.org Cc: Pradeep Ramakrishnan ; Chalapathi Andhe Subject: RE: A question on CE behavior on traffic forwarding to

[bess] A question on CE behavior on traffic forwarding to EVPN multihomed PEs in single-active mode

2019-02-12 Thread Jaikumar Somasundaram
Hello All, In EVPN MH with Single-Active scenario, could you help us to clarify the below query? -- || PORT1 | DEVICE1 |PORT3 --| PE1|- | 1/5| 2.2.2.2 | 1

Re: [bess] EVPN MH: Backup node behavior in Primary Path Failure

2018-10-09 Thread Jaikumar Somasundaram
ng of unknown unicast packets is administratively allowed), as it is not possible to select a single backup PE. Thanks & Regards Jaikumar S From: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2018 10:11 PM To: Jaikumar Somasundaram ; bess@ietf.org Cc: Jiang He ; P M

Re: [bess] EVPN MH: Backup node behavior in Primary Path Failure

2018-10-09 Thread Jaikumar Somasundaram
Thanks Mrinmoy. Response in-lined. From: Mrinmoy Ghosh (mrghosh) Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2018 11:40 PM To: Jaikumar Somasundaram ; Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) ; bess@ietf.org Cc: Jiang He ; P Muthu Arul Mozhi Subject: RE: [bess] EVPN MH: Backup node behavior in Primary Path

Re: [bess] EVPN MH: Backup node behavior in Primary Path Failure

2018-10-05 Thread Jaikumar Somasundaram
Thanks a lot Jorge, for your help to clarify that the traffic towards CE will get dropped when the Primary Path failed, until the a new DF is elected and becomes in forwarding state, as per RFC7432. Thanks & Regards Jaikumar S From: Jaikumar Somasundaram Sent: Friday, October 5, 2018 10:3

Re: [bess] EVPN MH: Backup node behavior in Primary Path Failure

2018-10-04 Thread Jaikumar Somasundaram
dropped. Please let me know if my understanding is right? Thanks & Regards Jaikumar S From: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2018 8:06 PM To: Jaikumar Somasundaram ; bess@ietf.org Cc: Jiang He ; P Muthu Arul Mozhi Subject: Re: [bess] EVPN MH: Backup node beha

Re: [bess] EVPN MH: Backup node behavior in Primary Path Failure

2018-10-04 Thread Jaikumar Somasundaram
In-line. From: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2018 3:33 PM To: Jaikumar Somasundaram ; bess@ietf.org Cc: Jiang He ; P Muthu Arul Mozhi Subject: Re: [bess] EVPN MH: Backup node behavior in Primary Path Failure In-line. Thx Jorge From: Jaikumar

Re: [bess] EVPN MH: Backup node behavior in Primary Path Failure

2018-10-04 Thread Jaikumar Somasundaram
Thanks Jorge for the quick reply. Please find further question below. From: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2018 1:52 PM To: Jaikumar Somasundaram ; bess@ietf.org Cc: Jiang He ; P Muthu Arul Mozhi Subject: Re: [bess] EVPN MH: Backup node behavior in Primary

[bess] EVPN MH: Backup node behavior in Primary Path Failure

2018-10-04 Thread Jaikumar Somasundaram
Hello Everyone, Sorry if it is a duplicate. I repost this query as I did not receive any response yet. (I was wondering if this mail already reached the group or not) I have a question on Primary PE encountering a failure in EVPN multihoming in single active mode. RFC7432, section 14.1.1:

[bess] EVPN MH: Backup node behavior in Primary Path Failure

2018-10-04 Thread Jaikumar Somasundaram
Hello Everyone, I have a question on Primary PE encountering a failure in EVPN multihoming in single active mode. RFC7432, section 14.1.1: If there is more than one backup PE for a given ES, the remote PE MUST use the primary PE's withdrawal of its set of Ethernet A-D per ES ro