Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags-07: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Given this document updates the normative behaviour of RFC 4761, I would have expected to see some discussion about interoperability. Is the behaviour as specified in RFC 4761 not widely deployed/implemented or would it be possible to add some sentences about interoperability which already deployed devices? One minor editorial request: - Please expand PE on first occurrence. _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
