Re: [bess] WG adoption for draft-skr-bess-evpn-redundant-mcast-source => need review from WG

Support. G/ From: BESS On Behalf Of slitkows.i...@gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2021 15:18 To: bess@ietf.org; draft-skr-bess-evpn-redundant-mcast-sou...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] WG adoption for draft-skr-bess-evpn-redundant-mcast-source => need review from WG Hi, We haven’t

Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-mcast-04

Support. This draft is needed and used within my customer architectures The draft is ready to be published G/ From: BESS On Behalf Of slitkows.i...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 15:25 To: 'BESS' Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll and IPR poll for draft-snr-bess-evpn-loop-protect

Yes, Support adoption. G/ From: BESS On Behalf Of Stephane Litkowski Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2019 16:06 To: stephane.litkow...@orange.com Cc: draft-snr-bess-evpn-loop-prot...@ietf.org; bess-cha...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] WG adoption poll and IPR poll for

Re: [bess] WG adoption call and IPR poll for draft-rabadan-bess-vendor-evpn-route-07

Support to adopt. I think this work is useful for the WG and the industry to progress. Brgds, G/ From: BESS On Behalf Of Stephane Litkowski Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 21:32 To: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WG adoption call and IPR poll for draft-rabadan-bess-vendor-evpn-route-07 Hi, This

Re: [bess] Second WG Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-proxy-arp-nd-06

Support publication, I read the original drafts and this version -06 and was involved with problem scenarios described in the draft. This work provides an answer to a real scalability problem experienced by IXPs, DCs and other operators, and resolves that problem to have scalable distributed

Re: [bess] WG Last Call and IPR Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-integ-01.txt

Support G/ From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 14:50 To: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-in...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WG Last Call and IPR Poll for

Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework

Yes, support. This is meaningful work. G/ From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of stephane.litkow...@orange.com Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 16:21 To: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hello working group, This email starts a

Re: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ac-df

I support progress and publish as RFC. The document is well written and resolves with a reasonable approach logical failures or human errors, that would otherwise result in significant service problems. I was wondering why this document, eventhough being backward compatible with RFC7432, is

Re: [bess] Call for adoption: draft-lin-bess-evpn-irb-mcast

Yep, support G/ -Original Message- From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Vigoureux Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 11:12 To: bess@ietf.org Cc: draft-lin-bess-evpn-irb-mc...@ietf.org Subject: [bess] Call for adoption: draft-lin-bess-evpn-irb-mcast Hello working

[bess] DC ROUTING BOF at IETF100 - call for meeting topics

Hi All, Apologies for the cross posting. Data Center Routing (DCROUTING) will be having a non-working-group-forming BOF during IETF100. Over the last year, there have been discussions in a number of routing area working groups about proposals