Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03

2016-10-18 Thread Martin Vigoureux
WG, we have now all the IPR answers and support for adopting the document. Authors, please republish as draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-00 Thank you -m Le 16/08/2016 14:37, Martin Vigoureux a écrit : Hello working group, This email starts a two-week poll on adopting

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03

2016-10-18 Thread Zhangjunlin
Hi, I support the adoption. And I am not aware of any IRP related with the draft. -邮件原件- 发件人: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Martin Vigoureux 发送时间: 2016年10月11日 23:12 收件人: bess@ietf.org 主题: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 WG

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03

2016-10-11 Thread Martin Vigoureux
WG there is support to adopt this document in BESS. *Important note* however, please be informed that we did not get responses, to the IPR question, from two Contributors. So, before we adopt this document I'd like to give you the opportunity to reflect on that and express your opinion on

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03

2016-09-30 Thread arkadiy.gulko
Support Arkadiy Gulko -Original Message- From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Vigoureux Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 8:37 AM To: bess@ietf.org Cc: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-upda...@ietf.org Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03

2016-09-20 Thread Keyur Patel
c: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-upda...@ietf.org > Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure- > updates-03 > > Hello working group, > > This email starts a two-week poll on adopting > draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 [1] as a

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03

2016-09-02 Thread Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
aag...@cisco.com>; Eric Rosen <ero...@juniper.net>; Martin > Vigoureux <martin.vigour...@nokia.com>; bess@ietf.org > Cc: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-upda...@ietf.org; Nikhil Shetty > (nikshett) <niksh...@cisco.com> > Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption:

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03

2016-09-02 Thread Arun Prakash (arprakas)
...@juniper.net>; Martin Vigoureux >> <martin.vigour...@nokia.com>; bess@ietf.org >> Cc: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-upda...@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum- >> procedure-updates-03 >> >> Why we need to

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03

2016-08-26 Thread Swadesh Agrawal (swaagraw)
Why we need to copy MVPN procedures in EVPN. Why not enable MVPN safi and enhance it for any EVPN specific requiremnt. Also going in this direction may require to add 5,6 and 7 routes as well in future. Regards Swadesh On 8/25/16, 2:22 PM, "Eric C Rosen" wrote: >Support. >

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03

2016-08-25 Thread Jeff Tantsura
Yes/support Regards, Jeff > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 5:37 AM -0700, "Martin Vigoureux" > wrote: > >> Hello working group, >> >> This email starts a two-week poll on adopting >> draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 [1] as a Working Group >> Document.

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03

2016-08-25 Thread Aldrin Isaac
Support as well.   On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 5:37 AM -0700, "Martin Vigoureux" wrote: Hello working group, This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 [1] as a Working Group Document. Please state on

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03

2016-08-25 Thread Eric C Rosen
Support. MVPN has a number of multicast features that are valuable, but haven't yet been incorporated into EVPN. This draft takes a comprehensive look at the MVPN procedures that provide those features, and shows how to adapt them to EVPN. This seems quite valuable to me, and thus I think

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03

2016-08-22 Thread Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
g-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-upda...@ietf.org > Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure- > updates-03 > > Hello working group, > > This email starts a two-week poll on adopting > draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 [1] as a Working Group >

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03

2016-08-16 Thread zhang . zheng
Support. Thanks, Sandy "BESS" 写于 2016/08/16 20:37:14: > Hello working group, > > This email starts a two-week poll on adopting > draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 [1] as a Working Group > Document. > > Please state on the list if you support adoption or

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03

2016-08-16 Thread Nabeel Cocker
support Thanks Nabeel On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Martin Vigoureux < martin.vigour...@nokia.com> wrote: > Hello working group, > > This email starts a two-week poll on adopting > draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 [1] as a Working Group > Document. > > Please state on the list

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03

2016-08-16 Thread Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US)
As coauthor, I fully support this document for WG adoption. It is very much needed to keep expanding the use-cases of EVPN in Operators. I’m not aware of any relevant IPR. Thanks. Jorge On 8/16/16, 5:37 AM, "Martin Vigoureux" wrote: Hello working group,

[bess] Poll for adoption: draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03

2016-08-16 Thread Martin Vigoureux
Hello working group, This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 [1] as a Working Group Document. Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases, please also state the reasons). This poll runs until *the 30th of