Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework
Support this draft and I'm not aware of any IPR relevant to the draft. Cheers, Vinod From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 16:21 To: bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org> Subject: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hello working group, This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-00 [1] This poll runs until *the 9th of April*. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. Currently no IPR has been disclosed against this Document. If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. We are also polling for any existing implementation. Thank you Matthew, Stéphane bess chairs [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework/ _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework
Support the draft and I am not aware of any IPR relevant to this document. Thanks Kiran From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of stephane.litkow...@orange.com Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 7:21 AM To: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hello working group, This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-00 [1] This poll runs until *the 9th of April*. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. Currently no IPR has been disclosed against this Document. If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. We are also polling for any existing implementation. Thank you Matthew, Stéphane bess chairs [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework/ _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework
I have read the draft and feel that it is ready to progress. -- Eric From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of stephane.litkow...@orange.com Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 10:21 AM To: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hello working group, This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-00 [1] This poll runs until *the 9th of April*. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. Currently no IPR has been disclosed against this Document. If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. We are also polling for any existing implementation. Thank you Matthew, Stéphane bess chairs [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework/ _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework
not aware of any undisclosed IPR (in E/// where I was working on what are now pieces of the draft) ... thanks --- tony On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 7:21 AM,wrote: > Hello working group, > > > > This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on > draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-00 [1] > > > > This poll runs until *the 9th of April*. > > > > We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to > this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with > IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > > If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please > respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any > relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from > all the Authors and Contributors. > > > > Currently no IPR has been disclosed against this Document. > > > > If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please > explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been > disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > > > > We are also polling for any existing implementation. > > > > Thank you > > > > Matthew, Stéphane > > bess chairs > > > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df- > election-framework/ > > > > _ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu > ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages > electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou > falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged > information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete > this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been > modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > > > ___ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess > > ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework
Hi WG, We have seen a very good support to make this draft progressing. Unfortunately we are still waiting for some IPR answers (mostly contributors). I have advised the required people to answer. In the meantime I will start the shepherd's review. Brgds, From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of stephane.litkow...@orange.com Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 16:21 To: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hello working group, This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-00 [1] This poll runs until *the 9th of April*. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. Currently no IPR has been disclosed against this Document. If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. We are also polling for any existing implementation. Thank you Matthew, Stéphane bess chairs [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework/ _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework
Support Thanks, Jim Uttaro From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Patrice Brissette (pbrisset) Sent: Monday, April 09, 2018 10:40 AM To: stephane.litkow...@orange.com; bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hi, I fully support this draft. Regards, Patrice Brissette From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>" <stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>> Date: Monday, March 26, 2018 at 4:21 PM To: "bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" <bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>> Subject: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hello working group, This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-00 [1] This poll runs until *the 9th of April*. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. Currently no IPR has been disclosed against this Document. If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. We are also polling for any existing implementation. Thank you Matthew, Stéphane bess chairs [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dbess-2Devpn-2Ddf-2Delection-2Dframework_=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=s7ZzB4JbPv3nYuoSx5Gy8Q=vum2OIQfHqjiVI3c-zzQ0EbGuW1HxZQM_2IuJubSVqw=Mtum66GGTNylFY4ZzFQeO8_Ju5VhkcJNpEqDZqTmmW0=> _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework
Hi, I fully support this draft. Regards, Patrice Brissette From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com" <stephane.litkow...@orange.com> Date: Monday, March 26, 2018 at 4:21 PM To: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org> Subject: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hello working group, This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-00 [1] This poll runs until *the 9th of April*. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. Currently no IPR has been disclosed against this Document. If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. We are also polling for any existing implementation. Thank you Matthew, Stéphane bess chairs [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework/ _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework
Hi Ali, Thanks, it looks good Brgds, From: Ali Sajassi (sajassi) [mailto:saja...@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, April 02, 2018 20:47 To: LITKOWSKI Stephane OBS/OINIS; Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View); bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hi Stephane, How about modifying the sentence to: “ HRW and AC-DF mechanisms are independent of each other. Therefore, a PE MAY support either HRW or AC-DF independently or MAY support both of them together. A PE MAY also support AC-DF capability along with existing DF election mechanism per [RFC7432].” Basically, what we are saying is that these two mechanisms are independent of each other and they don’t have to be implemented together. If an operator wants compliancy with this document, then it needs to specify if they want full compliancy (which is implementation of both mechanisms) or partial compliancy (which is implementation of one of the mechanisms). Regards, Ali From: "stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>" <stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>> Date: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 at 11:50 PM To: Cisco Employee <saja...@cisco.com<mailto:saja...@cisco.com>>, "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <jorge.raba...@nokia.com<mailto:jorge.raba...@nokia.com>>, "bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" <bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>> Subject: RE: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hi Ali, This paragraph points that HRW and AC-DF may be USED independently, but this does say that a vendor OS may implement HRW or AC-DF or both. I see two issues if it is not clarified: * When an operator pushes a RFP requesting support of this draft, both HRW and AC-DF support are defacto required * From a WG standpoint, to progress further the document we need an implementation that supports fully the draft so both HRW and AC-DF. My point is really on the implementation side, not on the usage. Brgds, From: Ali Sajassi (sajassi) [mailto:saja...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 18:44 To: LITKOWSKI Stephane OBS/OINIS; Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View); bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hi Stephane, In section 2.3, it says that: Both, HRW and AC-DF MAY be used independently or simultaneously. The AC-DF capability MAY be used with the default DF Election algorithm too. Do you want further clarification? If so, please suggest text. Thanks, Ali From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>" <stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>> Date: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 at 12:50 AM To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <jorge.raba...@nokia.com<mailto:jorge.raba...@nokia.com>>, "bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" <bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hi Jorge, More inline From: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) [mailto:jorge.raba...@nokia.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 00:38 To: LITKOWSKI Stephane OBS/OINIS; bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hi Stephane, Please see in-line. Thanks. Jorge From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>" <stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>> Date: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at 8:48 AM To: "bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" <bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hi Authors, Speaking as a WG member, I have two comments: - As I have pointed during the BESS meeting, it would be good to have a clear definition of what is a DF type vs a capability. [JORGE] yes, we can clarify this in the next rev along with any other comments made during this LC. - I think it would be good to have the draft telling that the implementation of HRW and AC-DF are optionals. [JORGE] Is that necessary? Since the draft is not updating RFC7432, aren’t those options implicitly optional for RFC7432 implementations? [SLI] I was more thinking about people implementing this draft (future RFC). Should they implement both HRW and AC-DF ? I don’t think so. Brgds, Stephane From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 16:21 To: be
Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework
Hi Stephane, How about modifying the sentence to: “ HRW and AC-DF mechanisms are independent of each other. Therefore, a PE MAY support either HRW or AC-DF independently or MAY support both of them together. A PE MAY also support AC-DF capability along with existing DF election mechanism per [RFC7432].” Basically, what we are saying is that these two mechanisms are independent of each other and they don’t have to be implemented together. If an operator wants compliancy with this document, then it needs to specify if they want full compliancy (which is implementation of both mechanisms) or partial compliancy (which is implementation of one of the mechanisms). Regards, Ali From: "stephane.litkow...@orange.com" <stephane.litkow...@orange.com> Date: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 at 11:50 PM To: Cisco Employee <saja...@cisco.com>, "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <jorge.raba...@nokia.com>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org> Subject: RE: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hi Ali, This paragraph points that HRW and AC-DF may be USED independently, but this does say that a vendor OS may implement HRW or AC-DF or both. I see two issues if it is not clarified: * When an operator pushes a RFP requesting support of this draft, both HRW and AC-DF support are defacto required * From a WG standpoint, to progress further the document we need an implementation that supports fully the draft so both HRW and AC-DF. My point is really on the implementation side, not on the usage. Brgds, From: Ali Sajassi (sajassi) [mailto:saja...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 18:44 To: LITKOWSKI Stephane OBS/OINIS; Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View); bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hi Stephane, In section 2.3, it says that: Both, HRW and AC-DF MAY be used independently or simultaneously. The AC-DF capability MAY be used with the default DF Election algorithm too. Do you want further clarification? If so, please suggest text. Thanks, Ali From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>" <stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>> Date: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 at 12:50 AM To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <jorge.raba...@nokia.com<mailto:jorge.raba...@nokia.com>>, "bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" <bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hi Jorge, More inline From: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) [mailto:jorge.raba...@nokia.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 00:38 To: LITKOWSKI Stephane OBS/OINIS; bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hi Stephane, Please see in-line. Thanks. Jorge From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>" <stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>> Date: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at 8:48 AM To: "bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" <bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hi Authors, Speaking as a WG member, I have two comments: - As I have pointed during the BESS meeting, it would be good to have a clear definition of what is a DF type vs a capability. [JORGE] yes, we can clarify this in the next rev along with any other comments made during this LC. - I think it would be good to have the draft telling that the implementation of HRW and AC-DF are optionals. [JORGE] Is that necessary? Since the draft is not updating RFC7432, aren’t those options implicitly optional for RFC7432 implementations? [SLI] I was more thinking about people implementing this draft (future RFC). Should they implement both HRW and AC-DF ? I don’t think so. Brgds, Stephane From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 16:21 To: bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org> Subject: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hello working group, This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-00 [1] This poll runs until *the 9th of April*. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as an
Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework
Hi Ali, This paragraph points that HRW and AC-DF may be USED independently, but this does say that a vendor OS may implement HRW or AC-DF or both. I see two issues if it is not clarified: - When an operator pushes a RFP requesting support of this draft, both HRW and AC-DF support are defacto required - From a WG standpoint, to progress further the document we need an implementation that supports fully the draft so both HRW and AC-DF. My point is really on the implementation side, not on the usage. Brgds, From: Ali Sajassi (sajassi) [mailto:saja...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 18:44 To: LITKOWSKI Stephane OBS/OINIS; Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View); bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hi Stephane, In section 2.3, it says that: Both, HRW and AC-DF MAY be used independently or simultaneously. The AC-DF capability MAY be used with the default DF Election algorithm too. Do you want further clarification? If so, please suggest text. Thanks, Ali From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>" <stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>> Date: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 at 12:50 AM To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <jorge.raba...@nokia.com<mailto:jorge.raba...@nokia.com>>, "bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" <bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hi Jorge, More inline From: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) [mailto:jorge.raba...@nokia.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 00:38 To: LITKOWSKI Stephane OBS/OINIS; bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hi Stephane, Please see in-line. Thanks. Jorge From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>" <stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>> Date: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at 8:48 AM To: "bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" <bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hi Authors, Speaking as a WG member, I have two comments: - As I have pointed during the BESS meeting, it would be good to have a clear definition of what is a DF type vs a capability. [JORGE] yes, we can clarify this in the next rev along with any other comments made during this LC. - I think it would be good to have the draft telling that the implementation of HRW and AC-DF are optionals. [JORGE] Is that necessary? Since the draft is not updating RFC7432, aren’t those options implicitly optional for RFC7432 implementations? [SLI] I was more thinking about people implementing this draft (future RFC). Should they implement both HRW and AC-DF ? I don’t think so. Brgds, Stephane From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 16:21 To: bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org> Subject: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hello working group, This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-00 [1] This poll runs until *the 9th of April*. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. Currently no IPR has been disclosed against this Document. If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. We are also polling for any existing implementation. Thank you Matthew, Stéphane bess chairs [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework/ _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi q
Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework
Hi Stephane, In section 2.3, it says that: Both, HRW and AC-DF MAY be used independently or simultaneously. The AC-DF capability MAY be used with the default DF Election algorithm too. Do you want further clarification? If so, please suggest text. Thanks, Ali From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com" <stephane.litkow...@orange.com> Date: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 at 12:50 AM To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <jorge.raba...@nokia.com>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hi Jorge, More inline From: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) [mailto:jorge.raba...@nokia.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 00:38 To: LITKOWSKI Stephane OBS/OINIS; bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hi Stephane, Please see in-line. Thanks. Jorge From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>" <stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>> Date: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at 8:48 AM To: "bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" <bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hi Authors, Speaking as a WG member, I have two comments: - As I have pointed during the BESS meeting, it would be good to have a clear definition of what is a DF type vs a capability. [JORGE] yes, we can clarify this in the next rev along with any other comments made during this LC. - I think it would be good to have the draft telling that the implementation of HRW and AC-DF are optionals. [JORGE] Is that necessary? Since the draft is not updating RFC7432, aren’t those options implicitly optional for RFC7432 implementations? [SLI] I was more thinking about people implementing this draft (future RFC). Should they implement both HRW and AC-DF ? I don’t think so. Brgds, Stephane From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 16:21 To: bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org> Subject: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hello working group, This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-00 [1] This poll runs until *the 9th of April*. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. Currently no IPR has been disclosed against this Document. If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. We are also polling for any existing implementation. Thank you Matthew, Stéphane bess chairs [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework/ _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages elect
Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework
Hi Jorge, More inline From: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) [mailto:jorge.raba...@nokia.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 00:38 To: LITKOWSKI Stephane OBS/OINIS; bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hi Stephane, Please see in-line. Thanks. Jorge From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>" <stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>> Date: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at 8:48 AM To: "bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" <bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hi Authors, Speaking as a WG member, I have two comments: - As I have pointed during the BESS meeting, it would be good to have a clear definition of what is a DF type vs a capability. [JORGE] yes, we can clarify this in the next rev along with any other comments made during this LC. - I think it would be good to have the draft telling that the implementation of HRW and AC-DF are optionals. [JORGE] Is that necessary? Since the draft is not updating RFC7432, aren’t those options implicitly optional for RFC7432 implementations? [SLI] I was more thinking about people implementing this draft (future RFC). Should they implement both HRW and AC-DF ? I don’t think so. Brgds, Stephane From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 16:21 To: bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org> Subject: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hello working group, This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-00 [1] This poll runs until *the 9th of April*. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. Currently no IPR has been disclosed against this Document. If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. We are also polling for any existing implementation. Thank you Matthew, Stéphane bess chairs [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework/ _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework
Support. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 26, 2018, at 7:21 AM,> wrote: > > Hello working group, > > This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on > draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-00 [1] > > This poll runs until *the 9th of April*. > > We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this > Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR > rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please > respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any > relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from > all the Authors and Contributors. > > Currently no IPR has been disclosed against this Document. > > If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly > respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in > conformance with IETF rules. > > We are also polling for any existing implementation. > > Thank you > > Matthew, Stéphane > bess chairs > > [1] > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework/ > > _ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu > ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages > electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou > falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged > information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete > this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been > modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > ___ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework
Hi Stephane, Please see in-line. Thanks. Jorge From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com" <stephane.litkow...@orange.com> Date: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at 8:48 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hi Authors, Speaking as a WG member, I have two comments: - As I have pointed during the BESS meeting, it would be good to have a clear definition of what is a DF type vs a capability. [JORGE] yes, we can clarify this in the next rev along with any other comments made during this LC. - I think it would be good to have the draft telling that the implementation of HRW and AC-DF are optionals. [JORGE] Is that necessary? Since the draft is not updating RFC7432, aren’t those options implicitly optional for RFC7432 implementations? Brgds, Stephane From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of stephane.litkow...@orange.com Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 16:21 To: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hello working group, This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-00 [1] This poll runs until *the 9th of April*. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. Currently no IPR has been disclosed against this Document. If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. We are also polling for any existing implementation. Thank you Matthew, Stéphane bess chairs [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework/ _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework
Support. Not aware of any relevant IPR related to this document. Thanks, Senthil. From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>" <stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>> Date: Monday, March 26, 2018 at 3:21 PM To: "bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" <bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>> Subject: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hello working group, This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-00 [1] This poll runs until *the 9th of April*. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. Currently no IPR has been disclosed against this Document. If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. We are also polling for any existing implementation. Thank you Matthew, Stéphane bess chairs [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework/ _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework
Support.. Thanks, Jim Uttaro From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Tantsura Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 6:26 PM To: stephane.litkow...@orange.com; bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Yes/support Cheers, Jeff From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of <stephane.litkow...@orange..com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange..com>> Date: Monday, March 26, 2018 at 07:21 To: "bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" <bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>> Subject: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hello working group, This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-00 [1] This poll runs until *the 9th of April*. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. Currently no IPR has been disclosed against this Document. If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. We are also polling for any existing implementation. Thank you Matthew, Stéphane bess chairs [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dbess-2Devpn-2Ddf-2Delection-2Dframework_=DwMFaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=s7ZzB4JbPv3nYuoSx5Gy8Q=Nj7ala8HxoY1_tR_uWBZfvHOfWT7pIHfUPkE7dWokDY=_JiQQiF1G32fOjVJHEC7fFuk2nXXXUSEoW9IBKwDfvM=> _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org<mailto:BESS@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_bess=DwQFaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=s7ZzB4JbPv3nYuoSx5Gy8Q=Nj7ala8HxoY1_tR_uWBZfvHOfWT7pIHfUPkE7dWokDY=_Az8k-tN2265hvDE2xJegAvR2z0IE2Sb-BdpReuXNKM=> ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework
Hi Authors, Speaking as a WG member, I have two comments: - As I have pointed during the BESS meeting, it would be good to have a clear definition of what is a DF type vs a capability. - I think it would be good to have the draft telling that the implementation of HRW and AC-DF are optionals. Brgds, Stephane From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of stephane.litkow...@orange.com Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 16:21 To: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hello working group, This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-00 [1] This poll runs until *the 9th of April*. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. Currently no IPR has been disclosed against this Document. If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. We are also polling for any existing implementation. Thank you Matthew, Stéphane bess chairs [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework/ _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework
Yes, support. This is meaningful work. G/ From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of stephane.litkow...@orange.com Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 16:21 To: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hello working group, This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-00 [1] This poll runs until *the 9th of April*. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. Currently no IPR has been disclosed against this Document. If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. We are also polling for any existing implementation. Thank you Matthew, Stéphane bess chairs [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework/ _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework
Yes/support Cheers, Jeff From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of <stephane.litkow...@orange.com> Date: Monday, March 26, 2018 at 07:21 To: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org> Subject: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hello working group, This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-00 [1] This poll runs until *the 9th of April*. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. Currently no IPR has been disclosed against this Document. If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. We are also polling for any existing implementation. Thank you Matthew, Stéphane bess chairs [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework/ _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ___ BESS mailing list b...@ietf..org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework
Support. Not aware of any IPR relevant to this document. The AC-DF capability described in this document is implemented in Nokia SROS for some time now. Thanks. Jorge From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com" <stephane.litkow...@orange.com> Date: Monday, March 26, 2018 at 3:21 PM To: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org> Subject: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hello working group, This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-00 [1] This poll runs until *the 9th of April*. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. Currently no IPR has been disclosed against this Document. If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. We are also polling for any existing implementation. Thank you Matthew, Stéphane bess chairs [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework/ _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework
Support, not aware of IPR related to this draft. From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of John E Drake <jdr...@juniper.net> Date: Monday, 26 March 2018 at 21:53 To: Stephane Litkowski <stephane.litkow...@orange.com>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Support, not aware of any undisclosed IPR. Yours Irrespectively, John From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of stephane.litkow...@orange.com Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 10:21 AM To: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hello working group, This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-00 [1] This poll runs until *the 9th of April*. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. Currently no IPR has been disclosed against this Document. If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. We are also polling for any existing implementation. Thank you Matthew, Stéphane bess chairs [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dbess-2Devpn-2Ddf-2Delection-2Dframework_=DwMFAw=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI=CRB2tJiQePk0cT-h5LGhEWH-s_xXXup3HzvBSMRj5VE=TyXHkQQ7I8_uCoBEuTTRjrG6el8KtjOLxvtmM4Tuy-Q=jFfB9_o__KPB3qNKrIvcSbsWkgVrTqMz7A2r6hbOR68=> _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework
Support Thanks Roberto From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Stephane Litkowski <stephane.litkow...@orange.com> Date: Monday, March 26, 2018 at 10:21 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org> Subject: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hello working group, This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-00 [1] This poll runs until *the 9th of April*. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. Currently no IPR has been disclosed against this Document. If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. We are also polling for any existing implementation. Thank you Matthew, Stéphane bess chairs [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework/ _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework
Support, not aware of any undisclosed IPR. Yours Irrespectively, John From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of stephane.litkow...@orange.com Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 10:21 AM To: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hello working group, This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-00 [1] This poll runs until *the 9th of April*. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. Currently no IPR has been disclosed against this Document. If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. We are also polling for any existing implementation. Thank you Matthew, Stéphane bess chairs [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dbess-2Devpn-2Ddf-2Delection-2Dframework_=DwMFAw=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI=CRB2tJiQePk0cT-h5LGhEWH-s_xXXup3HzvBSMRj5VE=TyXHkQQ7I8_uCoBEuTTRjrG6el8KtjOLxvtmM4Tuy-Q=jFfB9_o__KPB3qNKrIvcSbsWkgVrTqMz7A2r6hbOR68=> _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework
Hi Stephane, I am not aware of any IPR that hasn’t already been disclosed. Cisco has implemented the HRW DF election that is described in this draft. Thanks, —Satya From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>" <stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>> Date: Monday, March 26, 2018 at 7:21 AM To: "bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" <bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>> Subject: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hello working group, This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-00 [1] This poll runs until *the 9th of April*. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. Currently no IPR has been disclosed against this Document. If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. We are also polling for any existing implementation. Thank you Matthew, Stéphane bess chairs [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework/ _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework
I am not aware of any IPR that hasn’t already been disclosed. Regarding implementation, Cisco has implemented HRW DF election. Regards, Ali From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com" <stephane.litkow...@orange.com> Date: Monday, March 26, 2018 at 7:21 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org> Subject: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hello working group, This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-00 [1] This poll runs until *the 9th of April*. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. Currently no IPR has been disclosed against this Document. If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. We are also polling for any existing implementation. Thank you Matthew, Stéphane bess chairs [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework/ _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework
I support publication. Thanks, Acee From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Stephane Litkowski <stephane.litkow...@orange.com> Date: Monday, March 26, 2018 at 10:21 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org> Subject: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hello working group, This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-00 [1] This poll runs until *the 9th of April*. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. Currently no IPR has been disclosed against this Document. If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. We are also polling for any existing implementation. Thank you Matthew, Stéphane bess chairs [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework/ _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
[bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework
Hello working group, This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-00 [1] This poll runs until *the 9th of April*. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors. Currently no IPR has been disclosed against this Document. If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. We are also polling for any existing implementation. Thank you Matthew, Stéphane bess chairs [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework/ _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess