[bess] bess - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 104

2018-12-19 Thread IETF Meeting Session Request Tool
A new meeting session request has just been submitted by mankamana prasad mishra, a Secretary of the bess working group. - Working Group Name: BGP Enabled ServiceS Area Name: Routing Area Session Requester: mankamana mishra Number of

Re: [bess] Last Call: (Framework for EVPN Designated Forwarder Election Extensibility) to Proposed Standard

2018-12-19 Thread Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
Hi Neeraj, Thank you very much for reviewing. Besides John’s reply to your second comment, about the first comment, based on the feedback from the reviewers, we changed that sentence to: The effect of forwarding loops in a Layer-2 network is particularly severe because of the broadcast

Re: [bess] Comment on draft-ietf-bess-service-chaining-06

2018-12-19 Thread Stuart Mackie
Hi Andy, I‘m struggling to make the connection, since draft-ietf-bess-service-chaining is specifically about how to do service chaining without needing a new protocol like NSH, so SFF labels would never be used. In draft-ietf-bess-service-chaining , if MPLS transport were used between Service

Re: [bess] Last Call: (Framework for EVPN Designated Forwarder Election Extensibility) to Proposed Standard

2018-12-19 Thread Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
Hi Anoop, Thank you for your review. We took all your comments. Please see in-line how we are resolving them in rev 07. Thanks. Jorge -Original Message- From: BESS on behalf of "Satya Mohanty (satyamoh)" Date: Friday, December 7, 2018 at 6:09 PM To: Anoop Ghanwani , "bess@ietf.org"

Re: [bess] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-06

2018-12-19 Thread Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
Thank you Adrian and Satya. We added this sentence in the introduction section as suggested by Adrian: "This document does not intend to update [RFC7432] or [RFC8214] but improve the behavior of the DF Election on PEs that are upgraded to follow the described procedures." Hopefully this

Re: [bess] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-06

2018-12-19 Thread Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
Hi Francesca, Thank you very much for your review. Please see in-line how we are resolving your comments in the next revision (07, to be published asap). Thanks. Jorge -Original Message- From: BESS on behalf of Francesca Palombini Date: Friday, December 14, 2018 at 5:13 PM To:

[bess] REMINDER: Wg Adoption and IPR poll for draft-liu-bess-mvpn-yang-07

2018-12-19 Thread Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
Folks I’ve only seen responses from the draft authors so far. Generally, we would like to see evidence that a few more people have read the draft and agree it is a good starting point. I am therefore extending this WG adoption poll. If you have not already reviewed the draft, please can you

Re: [bess] BFD WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan; BESS input solicited

2018-12-19 Thread Greg Mirsky
Hi Anoop, et al., appreciate your check of the final version of the update to the draft. Below is the new text as in the working version: One use of VXLAN is in data centers interconnecting VMs of a tenant. VXLAN addresses requirements of the Layer 2 and Layer 3 data center network

Re: [bess] BFD WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan; BESS input solicited

2018-12-19 Thread Greg Mirsky
Hi Anoop, thank you for the great text you've contributed. Accepted. I'll update the working text and publish later today. Kind regards, Greg On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 5:19 AM Reshad Rahman (rrahman) wrote: > +1 to Anoop's comments. I've made similar comment to Greg privately, and > Anoop's

Re: [bess] BFD WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan; BESS input solicited

2018-12-19 Thread Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
+1 to Anoop's comments. I've made similar comment to Greg privately, and Anoop's proposed text clears things up. Regards, Reshad (no hat). On 2018-12-19, 1:54 AM, "Rtg-bfd on behalf of Anoop Ghanwani" wrote: Hi Greg, Yes this captures what I was trying to get added.

[bess] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-integ-05

2018-12-19 Thread Pete Resnick
Reviewer: Pete Resnick Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For

Re: [bess] Referencing material behind a paywall

2018-12-19 Thread Satya Mohanty (satyamoh)
Thank you Stephen, Carsten and Heather for your input. Jorge will be publishing the revised version soon. Best Regards, --Satya On 12/10/18, 2:14 PM, "Stephen Farrell" wrote: On 10/12/2018 20:41, Heather Flanagan wrote: > Ekr offered an interesting proposal that would have

Re: [bess] BFD WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan; BESS input solicited

2018-12-19 Thread Anoop Ghanwani
Greg, This is fine. Thanks, Anoop On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 7:01 AM Greg Mirsky wrote: > > Hi Anoop, et al., > appreciate your check of the final version of the update to the draft. Below > is the new text as in the working version: >One use of VXLAN is in data centers interconnecting VMs

Re: [bess] Last Call: (Framework for EVPN Designated Forwarder Election Extensibility) to Proposed Standard

2018-12-19 Thread Anoop Ghanwani
Thanks Jorge! On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 1:18 AM Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) wrote: > > Hi Anoop, > > Thank you for your review. We took all your comments. > Please see in-line how we are resolving them in rev 07. > > Thanks. > Jorge > > -Original Message- > From: BESS on

Re: [bess] Comment on draft-ietf-bess-service-chaining-06

2018-12-19 Thread Andrew G. Malis
Stuart, Thanks for your reply. I can see your point about wanting to do service chaining without the NSH (as I'm sure you're aware, draft-ietf-mpls-sfc is another example of this), but would you never have the need for service chain per-packet metadata as it's being used in the SFC WG? Even if