I guess it worth clarify CE using LAG or L2 switching to connect to PE in
On Wed, 13 Feb 2019, 07:51 Mrinmoy Ghosh (mrghosh) Hi Jaikumar,
> EVPN Single active heavily depends upon MAC Flush mechanism like MVRP or
> TCN Flush.
> In your topology, initially
Thanks Mrinmoy for the quick answer.
Thanks & Regards
From: Mrinmoy Ghosh (mrghosh)
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 1:21 PM
To: Jaikumar Somasundaram ; email@example.com
Cc: Pradeep Ramakrishnan ; Chalapathi Andhe
Subject: RE: A question on CE behavior on traffic forwarding to EVPN
Thank you very much for your clarification!
I made a mistake that I thought the BFD session is the base solution for UMH
Now I get it. Thank you!
BTW: In section 3.1.2, "draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-pic-08" may be mentioned as
another example like MPLS FRR.
thank you for your kind consideration of the proposed updates. I've logged
my answers under GIM3>> tag.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:44 PM wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> Thank you for your good modification and clarification!
> About two sections I still have some comments, I copy