>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> Can you please help us on the following issue.
>
> In the following diagram, PE1, PE2, PE3 are connected to the same ES [ES1]
> in Single active mode, and PE4 is a remote PE.
>
> Let’s say PE1 is advertising the MAC1 route, PE4 will install the MAC1
> with the PE1 as primary pat
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF.
Title : EVPN Interworking with IPVPN
Authors : Jorge Rabadan
Ali Sajassi
Hi Chalu,
Please read 7432 s.8.4: in single-active it is not an aliasing label/procedure
but a backup-path procedure.
It will answer your questions (both, actually).
There is no flooding once the MAC is learnt & distributed: cf. that’s the point.
[http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signatureto
Thanks again Stephane,
I think we have closure on most (but not all) of your points. I'll post another
revision now because it makes the incremental changes easier to process. But we
can have another go round if any of the unresolved issues merit it.
One thing to push back on from before was th
Adrian,
(resending to everyone, not just Adrian)
>>> References:
>>>
>>> I think that the mpls-sfc and mpls-sfc-encaps should also be
>>> normative as you are defining a controlplane to use them.
>>
>>I don't mind doing that.
>
> [SLI] These two are more debatable. Let's keep them as info, and
>
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF.
Title : BGP Control Plane for NSH SFC
Authors : Adrian Farrel
John Drake
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF.
Title : Updated processing of Control Flags for BGP VPLS
Authors : Ravi Singh
Kireeti
Hi Mankamana, Chairs,
I'd like to request 10 minutes for "draft-zwm-bess-es-failover-00";
presenter: Sandy Zhang
Thank you very much!
Best regards,
Sandy
原始邮件
发件人：MankamanaMishra(mankamis)
收件人：bess@ietf.org ;
日 期 ：2019年02月26日 00:54
主 题 ：[bess] Slot requests for BESS WG
My understanding:
For the single-active case in the diagram below, when PE4 receives the A-D
per ES route withdraw it won't know whether PE2 or PE3 will become the new
primary/DF for the , so it will start flooding the traffic
destined to MAC1. Then either PE2 or PE3 will become the new primary/DF
