Same here. Support since this is very useful
From: BESS on behalf of EXT Jeff Tantsura
Date: Tuesday, 4 September 2018 at 11:45
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)"
Cc: Stephane Litkowski , "bess@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04
Yes/support
On Tu
Stephane, I sent a list of question/clarifications/remarks some time ago. I
haven’t seen them addresses so far on this draft
From: BESS on behalf of Stephane Litkowski
Date: Monday, 3 September 2018 at 10:30
To: "bess@ietf.org"
Subject: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for
draft-ietf
Agreed.
From: BESS on behalf of Jorge Rabadan
Date: Monday, 24 September 2018 at 17:16
To: "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" , "bess@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [bess] Second WG Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-vpls-multihoming-02
I fully support the publication of this document.
It should have been an R
Attached were my comments which I sent at the time which were not addressed so
far in the doc.
Would be good if we can incorporate them before WG last call
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bess/current/msg00791.html
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf
Also how does the solution behave if the edge device is no longer connected to
the RR and does not get keys in time to refresh. Common issue in SD-WAN context
which is in scope from what I understood on the discussion with Linda.
From: BESS on behalf of Susan Hares
Date: Monday, 5 November 201
ice chains being tied to subnets, which isn’t the scenario that is usually
discussed in mobility applications where the chosen service chain is based on
subscriber/application. I can add a couple of sentences on this.
Regards
Stuart
-914 886 2534
From: "Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
I am not aware of IPR related to this draft other than the one that was
disclosed.
We have an implementation of some use cases in the draft
From: BESS on behalf of "Hassen, Clayton"
Date: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 at 07:30
To: Stephane Litkowski , "bess@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC,
I am happy with the update. The encapsulation could also mention segment
routing.
From: BESS on behalf of Stephane Litkowski
Date: Friday, 11 January 2019 at 00:37
To: "bess@ietf.org"
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: [bess] short WGLC for draft-ietf-bess-service-chaining
Hi,
The draft-i
I need to get into more details, but the current draft is written with
draft-ietf-mpls-sfc-04 dataplane in mind. I believe that the draft can be
useful with other dataplanes like: draft-ietf-mpls-sfc-encapsulation and
draft-guichard-spring-nsh-s
So I would like the see the BGP control plane exte
Agreed/Support
From: BESS on behalf of "Andrew G. Malis"
Date: Wednesday, 20 February 2019 at 08:24
To: Stephane Litkowski
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org"
, "draft-rabadan-sajassi-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interwork...@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for
draft-rab
I would support this doc as a WG doc, could be informational though
From: BESS on behalf of Stephane Litkowski
Date: Wednesday, 3 April 2019 at 13:34
To: "bess@ietf.org" ,
"draft-ietf-bess-service-chain...@ietf.org"
Subject: [bess] Poll to continue or not the work on
draft-ietf-bess-service
I echo that, there is a number of implementations in the field which uses this
mechanism
From: Yu Tianpeng
Date: Friday, 7 June 2019 at 11:15
To: "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)"
Cc: "bess@ietf.org" , "bess-cha...@ietf.org"
, "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-proxy-arp...@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [bess] Seco
Support as co-author and not aware of ipr related to this draft
From: EXT Jeff Tantsura
Date: Wednesday, 4 September 2019 at 22:18
To: "draft-keyupate-bess-evpn-virtual-...@ietf.org"
, "bess@ietf.org"
, "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)"
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [bess] WG adoption a
Support adoption, as this is useful addition to EPVN
From: BESS on behalf of Gunter VAN DE VELDE
Date: Tuesday, 1 October 2019 at 04:59
To: Stephane Litkowski , Stephane Litkowski
Cc: "draft-snr-bess-evpn-loop-prot...@ietf.org"
, "bess-cha...@ietf.org"
, "bess@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [bess
support
From: BESS on behalf of Jorge Rabadan
Date: Wednesday, 27 November 2019 at 14:49
To: "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" , "bess@ietf.org"
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for
draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00
Support.
Thx
Jorge
From: BESS
Support.
From: BESS on behalf of Jorge Rabadan
Date: Wednesday, 26 February 2020 at 16:12
To: "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" , "bess@ietf.org"
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-mcast-04
Support for publication, as co-au
Support as co-author. Not aware of IPR related to this draft
From: BESS on behalf of Senad IETF - Internet
Engineering Task Force
Date: Monday, 12 June 2017 at 21:28
To: "Vigoureux, Martin (Nokia - FR/Nozay)"
Cc: BESS
Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage
Full suppo
Read and no further comments, so ready for WGLC
As a co-author not aware of IPR related to this draft
We have implementation on this
On 16/06/2017, 15:43, "thomas.mo...@orange.com" wrote:
Hello Working Group,
This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-o
Adrian, the question is mainly what we are trying to achieve here with the
draft.
If the goal is providing E2E SR-TE and utilizing all paths between the
different DC(s) e.g. SR-TE policy does this as well.
You advertise a BGP SR-TE-policy with the different paths and you bind the
prefix to them
Yes/support
On 22/09/2017, 01:22, "BESS on behalf of Jeff Tantsura" wrote:
yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
On 9/12/17, 12:35 AM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux"
wrote:
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-we
And one more. Thx Thomas and welcome Stephane
From: BESS on behalf of EXT Jeff Tantsura
Date: Friday, 1 December 2017 at 14:00
To: Andrew Dolganow
Cc: Jorge Rabadan , Tony Przygienda
, "bess@ietf.org" , Alvaro Retana
Subject: Re: [bess] New bess Co-Chair
+1
Regards,
Jeff
On Dec 1, 2017, a
support
On 11/01/2018, 10:50, "BESS on behalf of Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain
View)" wrote:
Support as co-author. Not aware of any IPR relevant to this document.
This is an important document. It describes a solution that integrates
L2/L3 multicast in a very efficient and
Support as contributor, not aware of IPR related to this draft
From: BESS on behalf of Jorge Rabadan
Date: Monday, 29 January 2018 at 03:53
To: Stephane Litkowski , "bess@ietf.org"
, "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ac-df.auth...@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status) for
Thx for all the hard work Martin and enjoy the new endeavour.
From: BESS on behalf of Jorge Rabadan
Date: Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 19:40
To: "Satya Mohanty (satyamoh)" , Ali Sajassi
, Alvaro Retana , "bess@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [bess] New bess WG Co-Chair
+1
Excellent job, Martin, th
19:13
To: Adrian Farrel
Cc: "Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" , mpls
, SPRING WG List , "s...@ietf.org"
, "bess@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [sfc] [mpls] Progress with draft-farrel-mpls-sfc
Hi Adrian,
> That proxy may be a bump in the wire between the SFF and
I echo robert’s comment, while I agree that draft-ietf-bess-service-chaining is
useful work, we should not define yet another data-plane for it.
From: on behalf of Robert Raszuk
Date: Sunday, 18 March 2018 at 14:27
To: Adrian Farrel
Cc: "Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" ,
update it but for reference:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-guichard-sfc-nsh-sr-00
From: Stephane Litkowski
Date: Tuesday, 20 March 2018 at 10:24
To: "LINGALA, AVINASH" , "mohamed. boucadair"
, "UTTARO, JAMES" we ,
"Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)&qu
"mohamed. boucadair" ,
"Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" , Robert
Raszuk , Adrian Farrel
Cc: mpls , SPRING WG List , "s...@ietf.org"
, "bess@ietf.org"
Subject: RE: [mpls] [sfc] Progress with draft-farrel-mpls-sfc
I guess I am not being clear.
The issue as I se
Support, not aware of IPR related to this draft.
From: BESS on behalf of John E Drake
Date: Monday, 26 March 2018 at 21:53
To: Stephane Litkowski , "bess@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework
Support, not aware of any undisclosed IPR.
Yours Irrespe
Support, we have an implementation on this
From: BESS on behalf of EXT Jeff Tantsura
Date: Wednesday, 4 April 2018 at 00:59
To: "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" ,
"draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-in...@ietf.org"
, "bess@ietf.org"
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call
Support the adoption. Very useful solution and implemented by a number of
vendors.
From: BESS on behalf of John E Drake
Date: Monday, 9 April 2018 at 15:34
To: "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" ,
"draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-vpws-...@ietf.org"
, "bess@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [bess] WG adoption and I
Adrian, yes lets discuss in Montreal to see how we can move fwd here.
On 01/07/2018, 14:11, "Adrian Farrel" wrote:
Wim asked...
> would you consider adding an MPLS label to the SFIR route in order to
> support https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-malis-mpls-sfc-encapsulation-01.
Support as co-author
From: BESS on behalf of Jorge Rabadan
Date: Tuesday, 14 August 2018 at 01:26
To: Stephane Litkowski , "bess@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [bess] new WGLC for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-05
Support as co-author.
The document has been significantly improved and i
No aware of IPR related to this draft.
Document is stable and should progress to WG last call
From: BESS on behalf of Jorge Rabadan
Date: Tuesday, 14 August 2018 at 03:49
To: "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" , "bess@ietf.org"
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [bess] WG last call and IPR P
34 matches
Mail list logo
