are 2 Figure 2
3. Document is lack of mention on E-Tree, it should work without any
extra consideration right?
4. Please fix format issue in section 8 and update TBD in section 9.
Thanks,
Tim
On 2018/12/3 18:43, stephane.litkow...@orange.com wrote:
Hello Working Group,
This email starts a
Hi Jai,
I think draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-03 section-3.1 might help.
Thanks & Regards
Tim
From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jaikumar Somasundaram
Sent: 05 October 2018 06:07
To: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) ;
bess@ietf.org
Cc: Jiang He ; P M
with this approach, just share an idea so
far open the discussion.
Regards, and lots of thanks in advance,
Tim
From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexander Vainshtein
Sent: 23 October 2018 14:42
To: Wanghaibo (Rainsword)
Cc: draft-wang-bess-evpn-control-word.auth...@ietf.org
oposes a graceful way that
traffic can be forwarded with a label advertised together with CW capability,
such that egress PE can indicate CW via the label on the forwarding plane.
Happy for further discussion on this as CW of EVPN topic has been raised couple
of times recently.
Thanks & Re
ion.
Then designers and maintenance have a clear idea of whether each ELAN is
misordering sensitive or not.
In case there are other services not sensitive to misordering, we can have a
new EVI and put it in other VLANs.
Thanks,
Tim
From: Alexander Vainshtein [mailto:alexander.vainsht...@ecitele
Hi,
Some comments below.
Regards,
Tim
-Original Message-
From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Bensley
Sent: 29 October 2018 13:34
To: bess@ietf.org; p...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] CW in EVPN: Was Signaling Control Word in EVPN
On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 09:28
Reviewer: Tim Chown
Review result: Ready
Hi,
This is a INT-DIR review of draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-06.
I am not very familiar with RFC5549, and not a subject matter expert, so found
myself referring back to that document quite a lot, trying to get a clear view
of the -bis differences. I
Reviewer: Tim Chown
Review result: Has Issues
Hi,
I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These
comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of
the IETF d
Reviewer: Tim Chown
Review result: Has Issues
Hi,
I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments
were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF
d
