[bess] FW: New Version Notification for draft-xu-bess-encaps-udp-00.txt

2015-02-12 Thread Xuxiaohu
regards, Xiaohu -Original Message- From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:01 AM To: Nischal Sheth; Xuxiaohu; Rajiv Asati; Xuxiaohu; Nischal Sheth; Rajiv Asati Subject: New Version Notification for draft-xu-bess-encaps-udp-00

Re: [bess] Why transform draft-xu-softwire-encaps-udp to draft-xu-bess-encaps-udp

2015-02-12 Thread Xuxiaohu
-Original Message- From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Xuxiaohu Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:21 AM To: bess@ietf.org Cc: Softwires WG Subject: [bess] Why transform draft-xu-softwire-encaps-udp to draft-xu-bess-encaps-udp Hi all, According to the suggestion from

Re: [bess] New Version Notification for draft-xu-bess-l3vpn-prefix-orf-00.txt

2015-02-01 Thread Xuxiaohu
By the way, this draft is an update of the previous draft (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-l3vpn-prefix-orf-00). -Original Message- From: Xuxiaohu Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 10:00 AM To: bess@ietf.org Subject: FW: New Version Notification for draft-xu-bess-l3vpn-prefix

[bess] FW: New Version Notification for draft-xu-bess-virtual-subnet-rib-reduction-00.txt

2015-02-01 Thread Xuxiaohu
Any comments and suggestions are welcome. Best regards, Xiaohu -Original Message- From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2015 5:29 PM To: Brendan Fee; Xuxiaohu; Brendan Fee; Susan Hares; Yongbing Fan; Xuxiaohu; Truman Boyes

Re: [bess] Request for WG adoption of draft-xu-bess-encaps-udp//RE: Why transform draft-xu-softwire-encaps-udp to draft-xu-bess-encaps-udp

2015-02-14 Thread Xuxiaohu
indicated by the protocol type sub-TLV. Best regards, Xiaohu Adrian -Original Message- From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Xuxiaohu Sent: 13 February 2015 06:10 To: Xuxiaohu; bess@ietf.org; bess-cha...@tools.ietf.org Cc: draft-xu-bess-encaps-...@tools.ietf.org

Re: [bess] Request for WG adoption of draft-xu-bess-encaps-udp//RE: Why transform draft-xu-softwire-encaps-udp to draft-xu-bess-encaps-udp

2015-02-14 Thread Xuxiaohu
Thanks for making that suggestion. Although RFC5512 (i.e., draft-ietf-softwire-encaps-safi) and RFC5566 (i.e., draft-ietf-softwire-encaps-ipsec) have been originated from Softwire WG and the current Softwire WG charter (https://tools.ietf.org/wg/softwire/charters) still state that BGP and

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-xu-l3vpn-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction

2015-01-07 Thread Xuxiaohu
Support as a co-author. I'm not aware of any IPR related to this doc. Best regards, Xiaohu -Original Message- From: Martin Vigoureux [mailto:martin.vigour...@alcatel-lucent.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2015 7:06 PM To: bess@ietf.org Cc:

Re: [bess] Request for WG adoption of draft-xu-bess-encaps-udp//RE: Why transform draft-xu-softwire-encaps-udp to draft-xu-bess-encaps-udp

2015-03-03 Thread Xuxiaohu
Hi Adrian, Thanks a lot for your quick response. -Original Message- From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 9:14 PM To: Xuxiaohu; bess@ietf.org Subject: RE: [bess] Request for WG adoption of draft-xu-bess-encaps-udp//RE: Why transform draft-xu

[bess] one additional use case for L3VPN Prefix ORF (i.e., path optimization in hybrid cloud scenarios)

2015-05-14 Thread Xuxiaohu
Hi all, In the hybrid cloud scenario where the private cloud (i.e., the on-premises data center) is connected to the public cloud via service providers' L3VPN, if a subnet in the public cloud is extended across multiple DC locations (either via L3VPN or L2VPN), the L3VPN PE on the private

Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet

2015-05-19 Thread Xuxiaohu
I'm not aware of any relevant IPR. Best regards, Xiaohu -Original Message- From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Vigoureux Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 3:13 AM To: BESS Subject: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet Hello this email

Re: [bess] [Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-rosen-idr-tunnel-enaps-00.txt (7/6 to 7/20/2015)

2015-07-24 Thread Xuxiaohu
Hi all, The major rationale of the BGP Encap SAFI is as follows: Since the encapsulation information is coded as an attribute, one could ask whether a new SAFI is really required. After all, a BGP speaker could simply attach the tunnel encapsulation attribute to each prefix (like Q

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-02

2015-11-09 Thread Xuxiaohu
at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-03 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-03 Best regards, Xiaohu From: Xuxiaohu Sent: Monday, November 02, 2015 1:04 PM To: Alvaro Retana (aretana

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-02

2015-11-10 Thread Xuxiaohu
Alvaro, I will update it ASAP. Best regards, Xiaohu From: Alvaro Retana (aretana) [mailto:aret...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 2:27 AM To: Xuxiaohu; draft-ietf-bess-virtual-sub...@ietf.org Cc: VIGOUREUX, MARTIN (MARTIN); bess-cha...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: AD

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc

2015-11-01 Thread Xuxiaohu
How to interconnect DC VPNs with WAN VPNs in a much scalable way is very important in the hybrid cloud scenario, especially for those SPs who operate both DC VPNs and WAN VPNs. Therefore, it support the WG adoption of this draft. Best regards, Xiaohu 发件人:

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-02

2015-11-01 Thread Xuxiaohu
Hi Alvaro, Thanks for your detailed AD review. We will update the draft according to your comments soon. Best regards, Xiaohu (on behalf of all co-authors) 发件人: Alvaro Retana (aretana) [aret...@cisco.com] 发送时间: 2015年10月28日 5:38 收件人:

Re: [bess] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2015-12-08 Thread Xuxiaohu
Hi Stephen, > -Original Message- > From: Stephen Farrell [mailto:stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie] > Sent: Monday, December 07, 2015 8:00 PM > To: Xuxiaohu; The IESG > Cc: draft-ietf-bess-virtual-sub...@ietf.org; bess-cha...@ietf.org; > martin.vigour...@alcatel-lucent.com; b

Re: [bess] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2015-12-03 Thread Xuxiaohu
Hi Stephen, Thank a lot for your DISCUSS. I fully agree with you that sensitive traffic being handled by VMs should be encrypted when traversing across the Internet or even SP networks. Similarly, I think you would also agree that sensitive traffic of VPN clients should be encrypted as well in

Re: [bess] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-06: (with COMMENT)

2015-12-02 Thread Xuxiaohu
Hi Ben, Thanks for your comments. Please see my response inline. > -Original Message- > From: Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@nostrum.com] > Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 6:29 AM > To: The IESG > Cc: draft-ietf-bess-virtual-sub...@ietf.org; aret...@cisco.com; > bess-cha...@ietf.org;

Re: [bess] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2015-12-18 Thread Xuxiaohu
> -Original Message- > From: Stephen Farrell [mailto:stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie] > Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 3:21 PM > To: Xuxiaohu; Alvaro Retana (aretana); The IESG > Cc: draft-ietf-bess-virtual-sub...@ietf.org; bess-cha...@ietf.org; > martin.vigour...@alcate

Re: [bess] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2015-12-17 Thread Xuxiaohu
about this usage? Best regards, Xiaohu > -Original Message- > From: Stephen Farrell [mailto:stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie] > Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 5:00 PM > To: Xuxiaohu; Alvaro Retana (aretana); The IESG > Cc: draft-ietf-bess-virtual-sub...@ietf.org; bess-

Re: [bess] Introducing a one-implementation requirement before WG last calls

2015-11-30 Thread Xuxiaohu
I fully agree with Eric's points. In addition to the side-effects Eric had raised, I think it may intensify the monopolization in specification due to the implementation requirement before WG LC. For example, some giants could afford the implementation of whatever specifications they had

[bess] 答复: Lack of implementation for draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction - submit to IESG?

2016-10-13 Thread Xuxiaohu
Hi Martin, We have just implemented RFC7814 a couple of months before in response to the demands of some of our customers, and those customers have deployed this L3-based overlay technology within their hyper-scale cloud data center network environment recently. We are planning to implement