Re: [bess] Comment on draft-ietf-bess-service-chaining-06

2018-12-19 Thread Andrew G. Malis
Stuart, Thanks for your reply. I can see your point about wanting to do service chaining without the NSH (as I'm sure you're aware, draft-ietf-mpls-sfc is another example of this), but would you never have the need for service chain per-packet metadata as it's being used in the SFC WG? Even if th

Re: [bess] Comment on draft-ietf-bess-service-chaining-06

2018-12-19 Thread Stuart Mackie
Hi Andy, I‘m struggling to make the connection, since draft-ietf-bess-service-chaining is specifically about how to do service chaining without needing a new protocol like NSH, so SFF labels would never be used. In draft-ietf-bess-service-chaining , if MPLS transport were used between Service

[bess] Comment on draft-ietf-bess-service-chaining-06

2018-12-04 Thread Andrew G. Malis
I just read the new revision of draft-ietf-bess-service-chaining. Although the draft doesn't use the RFC 8300 NSH, it could very easily take advantage of features provided by the NSH (such as metadata) by adding NSH over MPLS as defined in draft-ietf-mpls-sfc-encapsulation to the list of encapsulat