Re: [bess] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8584 (5900)

...@nokia.com; kiran.naga...@nokia.com; slitkows.i...@gmail.com; martin.vigour...@nokia.com; frank...@realtek.com; bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8584 (5900) This should be rejected as well. Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 12, 2019, at 5:32 PM, RFC Errata Sys

Re: [bess] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8584 (5900)

Hi! I believe you may misunderstand the definition of Broadcast domain (BD) and bridge table( as known as bridge domain). 6.2. VLAN Bundle Service Interface With this service interface, an EVPN instance corresponds to multiple broadcast

Re: [bess] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8584 (5900)

Yes, This errata should be rejected because VLAN-bundle service requires ONLY a single BD - that is analogous to SVL mode in 802.1Q. It is VLAN-aware bundle service that requires multiple BDs! Cheers, Ali On 11/12/19, 7:37 AM, "John E Drake" wrote: This should be rejected as well.

Re: [bess] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8584 (5900)

This should be rejected as well. Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 12, 2019, at 5:32 PM, RFC Errata System > wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8584, > "Framework for Ethernet VPN Designated Forwarder Election Extensibility". > >